The Supreme Court urged Kerala and the Central government to resolve financial disputes through dialogue. Both sides agreed to meet, following the Court’s recommendation. The meeting aims to address urgent funding concerns and bridge the gap in financial management. This marks a critical opportunity for open communication and collaboration, setting important precedents for India’s federal structure.
The Supreme Court uncovered a concerning practice in Kerala, where service contracts were being awarded at rates three times higher than usual, raising issues of fairness and transparency. This emerged during a review of a construction contract petition, prompting calls for oversight and reform to ensure fairness in Kerala’s service sector contracts.
The Koodathayi cyanide murders case involves the deaths of six individuals in Kerala, linked to prime accused Jolly Joseph. The denial of her bail plea by the Kerala High Court, amid allegations of premeditated conspiracy, signals the gravity of the accusations. The case grips the public’s attention, reflecting the complexities of ongoing legal battles.
The Kerala government submitted an affidavit to the Supreme Court, stating it had no plans to conduct a caste survey and emphasized the responsibility of the Central government in conducting such surveys. The government refuted allegations of intentional disobedience and highlighted the challenges in utilizing socio-economic data for policymaking. This case has significant implications for the identification and support of backward classes in Kerala.
The former senior Government Pleader from Kerala, Adv P G Manu, was denied anticipatory bail by the Supreme Court after being accused of raping a woman seeking legal advice. The survivor alleges multiple instances of assault and distribution of private pictures. This case highlights the need for accountability in positions of authority and justice for survivors.
A Kerala court has sentenced 15 individuals, including members of PFI and SDPI, to death for the murder of BJP leader Ranjith Sreenivas. The brutal killing, in front of his family, stemmed from political rivalries. The court’s decision is seen as a deterrent against political violence and emphasizes the judiciary’s commitment to justice.
The Kerala High Court has granted permission for a family to continue their tradition of offering cooked meat to a goddess in their private temple during the ‘Thirra Maholsavam’ festival. This decision reaffirms the balance between cultural heritage and legal frameworks, emphasizing the right to maintain religious customs within private domains (50 words).
The Supreme Court of India acknowledged Kerala government’s challenge against the Central government’s borrowing restrictions, emphasizing the impact on the state’s financial autonomy. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal highlighted the severe consequences on Kerala’s ability to fulfill budgetary commitments and requested interim relief. This case has significant implications for India’s federal structure and fiscal autonomy.
Kerala has recently escalated its legal challenge against the Governor’s handling of legislative bills by approaching the Supreme Court. The state seeks to establish clear guidelines for the Governor’s role in either approving, reserving for the President’s consideration, or returning bills to the Legislative Assembly. This move marks the second time in two weeks that […]
The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has quashed the reappointment of Dr. Gopinath Ravindran as the Vice-Chancellor of Kannur University in Kerala, citing “unwarranted interference” by the state government. The bench, headed by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and comprising Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, emphasized that the decision-making process […]