In a 2017 murder case of a Madrassa teacher in Kerala, three RSS activists were acquitted due to significant lapses in the police investigation. The court highlighted investigative failures and lack of evidence, causing disappointment for the victim’s family and sparking political reactions. This case raises concerns about justice, communal tensions, and police effectiveness.
During the hearing of the Abhimanyu murder case on March 18, the Ernakulam Principal Sessions Court remarked that the disappearance of documents from courts was not a novel occurrence. Eleven crucial documents, including a 5,000-page chargesheet, post-mortem certificate, wound certificate, and statements of the accused and witnesses, reportedly went missing in January 2019. In in […]
On Monday (11th March): The Supreme Court has urged the Central government to provide Kerala with a one-time financial relief package to address the state’s economic challenges. Emphasizing cooperation between the central and state governments, the Court proposed temporary concessions for Kerala. This direction follows Kerala’s plea citing financial crisis exacerbated by borrowing restrictions and unpaid dues.
The Kerala High Court prioritizes human safety over stray dog protection, citing instances of dog attacks impacting citizens. The court calls for guidelines on licensing individuals to care for stray dogs. This follows a case involving a resident caring for injured strays, leading to conflict in the community. The court directs the resident to obtain a license and comply with animal welfare laws.
The Supreme Court Today nullified the Kerala High Court ruling to prosecute a contractor for contaminated cardamom in Sabarimala Temple’s Aravana Prasadam. Justices stated the High Court shouldn’t have entertained petitions from a disgruntled party. The case involves religious and health concerns, emphasizing legal complexities in religious traditions and public safety.
The Kerala High Court emphasized the societal service aspect of the legal profession, rejecting the notion of law as a money-making machine. Justice Devan Ramachandran urged dedication and competence over financial gains, underlining that legal services should not be charged by the hour. The remarks were made during a hearing concerning a petition filed by a practicing lawyer from Kottayam.
The Kerala High Court is challenged Today by gynaecologists over the mandate that only women can examine sexual assault survivors, contending it contradicts legal provisions and burdens specialists while causing delays. The case highlights the need for a balanced approach to medical examinations and may have far-reaching implications. The judge is open to addressing any issues.
Former Supreme Court Justice KM Joseph emphasized that the Indian Constitution inherently embraces secular values, regardless of the explicit mention of ‘secularism’ in the preamble. He highlighted that the removal of the word “secular” would not diminish the equality guaranteed under relevant articles. Justice Joseph underlined the significance of secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution.
The Kerala government is locked in a legal battle with the Central Government over borrowing limitations, which the state argues impede its financial independence. The Supreme Court is deliberating on the dispute, emphasizing the need for negotiation. This case has significant implications for India’s fiscal federal structure, federalism principles, and states’ financial autonomy.
The Kerala High Court’s recent decision in the TP Chandrasekharan murder case is a significant development. The court not only dismissed appeals by convicts but also convicted two individuals previously acquitted. This underscores the court’s commitment to justice and accountability in a case that has gripped Kerala for years, addressing the complexities of political violence.