Vishnu Shankar Jain, a lawyer representing the Hindu side in a mosque-temple dispute, filed an FIR after receiving a threatening comment on social media from Nidhi Jha, inciting community tensions. The case includes charges of criminal intimidation and provocation. The Supreme Court emphasizes maintaining peace amid ongoing disputes and violence in Sambhal.
Today, On 11th September, in the Gyanvapi case, the Hindu side requested court permission for an Archaeological Survey of India excavation at the disputed site, aiming to uncover evidence of its religious history. The court will assess this request amid the ongoing legal dispute with the Muslim community. This case centers on the claim that a mosque was built atop an ancient Hindu temple, sparking a heated legal battle.
The Allahabad High Court disclosed a threat against Judge Ravi Kumar Diwakar, who ordered a survey of the Gyanvapi Mosque. An investigation uncovered a plot by Islamic fundamentalist groups to assassinate him. The controversy stems from differing claims about the mosque’s history. This event highlights the challenges faced by the judiciary in India, especially regarding sensitive religious cases.
Allahabad High Court Sets September 18 for Gyanvapi Mosque Case Hearing The Allahabad High Court has marked September 18 for further hearings on a petition that challenges the validity of a lawsuit pushing for the “restoration” of a temple at the site of the Gyanvapi mosque in Varanasi. This decision was taken after neither the […]
