A woman has approached the Bombay High Court against the unauthorized use of her photo in state advertisements and political campaigns. She claimed that her image was used to promote government schemes without her consent. The issue arose after a photographer uploaded her picture on Shutterstock without permission. The case raises concerns about privacy and misuse of personal images in public campaigns.
NEW DELHI: On Tuesday, 18th Feb: the Supreme Court dismissed the petition filed by Sukesh Chandrashekhar, an alleged conman, who had asked for a transfer from Delhi’s Mandoli jail to a prison in his home state of Karnataka, or any nearby state. A Bench of Justices Bela Trivedi and PB Varale gave their decision, emphasizing that the accused, in this case, had caused harm to society, and the Court also had to consider the rights of the victims.
Today, On 13th February, The Delhi High Court issued stay Adyar Gate from using the ‘Dakshin’ name after ITC filed a lawsuit. ITC claimed exclusive rights over the mark and objected to Adyar Gate’s new restaurant in Chennai’s Alwarpet. The court’s order prevents the restaurant from operating under the disputed name. This ruling highlights the importance of trademark protection in business disputes.
The Karnataka High Court declined to quash a case against former Chief Minister BS Yediyurappa under the POCSO Act, citing substantial evidence including an audio recording. However, it criticized the trial court’s initial cognizance order as inadequate. Yediyurappa was granted bail, and the case will be reconsidered by the trial court.
Today, On 4th January, The Supreme Court rejected Karnataka’s plea to classify necrophilia as rape under Section 375 of the IPC. Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Ahsanuddin Amanullah stated that making such legal changes is the responsibility of Parliament. The Bench emphasized that courts cannot expand the definition of rape beyond the existing legal framework. Any modification to the law must come through legislative action.
The Karnataka High Court is deliberating on transferring the controversial Mysuru Urban Development Authority (MUDA) site allotment case to an independent agency. The case implicates Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and others in irregularities concerning compensatory site allocations. Petitioners doubt the Lokayukta police’s capacity to investigate due to potential bias, seeking a CBI inquiry instead.
![[BREAKING] Supreme Court May Transfer CLAT 2025 Result Petitions to Punjab and Haryana High Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CLAT-2025.webp?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 10th January, Former Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud will give the keynote speech at the 15th convocation of JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research (JSS AHER) today. The event will gather students, teachers, and special guests to celebrate academic success. Chandrachud, known for his important decisions and work in the Indian judiciary, is expected to deliver an inspiring speech. This convocation is an important moment for JSS AHER, showing its dedication to quality education and overall development.
The Supreme Court Today (Jan 3) refused to hear Congress MLA TD Rajegowda’s plea challenging “vague allegations” made by BJP leader DN Jeevaraja, who questioned his 2023 Karnataka election win in the High Court. Rajegowda argued the claims, like using black money, lacked evidence, but the Court noted evidence could be submitted later. It referred to its 2024 order allowing objections on evidence admissibility during trial, stating, “‘Admissibility’ or ‘relevance’ is the word used … It takes care of your concern.”
