![[BREAKING] Supreme Court Collegium Recommends Calcutta HC Justice Joymalya Bagchi for Elevation](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Justice-Joymalya-Bagchi-%E0%A6%8F%E0%A6%B0-%E0%A6%B8%E0%A7%87%E0%A6%B0%E0%A6%BE-%E0%A7%A7%E0%A7%A6-%E0%A6%9F%E0%A6%BF-%E0%A6%96%E0%A6%AC%E0%A6%B0-%E0%A6%8F%E0%A6%95%E0%A6%9D%E0%A6%B2%E0%A6%95%E0%A7%87-%E0%A5%A4-Justice-Joymalya-Bagchi-News-In-Bengali.jpeg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
A petition by lawyer Mathew J. Nedumpara seeks to challenge the designation of 70 senior advocates by the Delhi High Court, alleging the process is influenced by favouritism and unlawful factors. The Supreme Court will hear the case on January 2, 2025, addressing the implications for equality and professional rights under the Constitution.
The Supreme Court acquitted George, convicted in a 2015 murder case, criticizing the reliance on inconsistent testimony of the deceased’s father. The court emphasized that testimony from “interested witnesses” cannot be dismissed outright but must be evaluated carefully. The prior conviction was set aside due to errors in judgment.
The Supreme Court directed state governments to submit affidavits detailing winter shelter plans for homeless individuals, emphasizing the urgency due to the approaching winter. Justices B.R. Gavai and K.V. Viswanathan invited the Attorney General for assistance and recommended corporate social responsibility initiatives to improve available resources for shelters.
The Supreme Court, while hearing a plea against the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters Act, described it as “draconian.” Justices Gavai and Viswanathan admitted the appeal and pointed out the need for further consideration. Concerns were raised about civil liberties and misuse of the Act, which targets organized crime in Uttar Pradesh.
The Supreme Court today (25th Oct) declined a request for an interim status quo on the demolition of Muslim religious structures in Gujarat, informed by the state’s assurance that the land will remain government-owned. Ongoing legal disputes include challenges to earlier court decisions and concerns over alleged unauthorized demolitions impacting recognized sites. Further hearings are scheduled.
Revanth Reddy, arrested in 2015 for allegedly bribing an MLA during legislative council elections, faced Supreme Court scrutiny. The court advised against his interference in the prosecution while rejecting a trial transfer request. Concerns emerged regarding Reddy’s influence as Chief Minister, prompting potential appointment of an independent prosecutor for impartiality.
Yesterday, On 8th July, The Supreme Court dismissed West Bengal government’s plea to suspend CBI probe into ration scam cases. The High Court directed CBI to investigate ration scam cases, sexual assault, and land grabbing in Sandeshkhali, despite the state’s objections. The CBI was instructed to conduct a comprehensive probe, given the alleged association between key individuals involved in the cases.
The Supreme Court of India set to hear the Bharatiya Janata Party’s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order on advertising. The High Court’s ruling limited the BJP’s promotional activities during the Lok Sabha elections. The appeal addresses concerns over restrictions on the party’s advertising content, which is deemed violative of the Model Code of Conduct.
![[Ration Distribution Scam] SC Rejects West Bengal's Plea Against CBI Investigation](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-22-3.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
