![[Youtuber's Video Retweet Case] SC Extended Stay To Kejriwal to Settle Dispute with Complainant in Defamation Case](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/1429579-kejriwal.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today(on15th April),The Supreme Court issued a notice to the Enforcement Directorate (ED) following a plea by Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal challenging his arrest and remand in a money laundering case tied to the Delhi excise policy. The court scheduled further examination for April 29 and requested responses by April 24 and 27. Kejriwal is currently detained in Tihar Jail.
![[BREAKING] Krishna Janmabhoomi Case | Muslim Party's Objections to Maintainability of Hindu Side's Suits Rejected by Allahabad HC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Screenshot-2024-03-19-135613.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court Today disposed of a plea challenging the Allahabad High Court’s order on Mathura’s Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah Masjid dispute. It allowed the Shahi Masjid Idgah to pursue a recall application. The Supreme Court also upheld the interim stay on the implementation of the high court’s order for a court-monitored survey of the Shahi Idgah Mosque complex.
The legal saga began when Arvind Kejriwal retweeted a video titled “BJP IT Cell Part II” in May 2018, leading to a defamation complaint by Vikas Sankrityayan. Video made by YouTuber Dhruv Rathee, which allegedly contained defamatory content against the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) IT Cell. Supreme Court Extends Stay on Against Arvind Kejriwal. The […]
The Supreme Court overturned an NGT order, absolving banks from liability for illegal activities carried out by borrowers on mortgaged premises. The Court emphasized that the onus for such misconduct lies with the borrower, granting the bank permission to transfer the property and advised the NGT to exercise prudence in attributing accountability to financial institutions.
The Supreme Court criticized SEBI for taking a decade to issue a show-cause notice to a finance company accused of misappropriating funds, emphasizing the need for regulatory efficiency. The court questioned SEBI’s delayed investigation, signaling a call for accountability and improvement within the regulatory body. This critique highlights the challenges in regulatory oversight and the necessity for timely and effective regulation.
The Supreme Court of India has set a final hearing in April regarding the controversial Bihar government’s caste-based survey, facing legal scrutiny and public interest petitions. The case delves into privacy, governance, and social justice implications, with far-reaching consequences for Indian society and governance.
New Delhi, January 16: The Supreme Court of India has deferred the hearing of a pivotal plea concerning the implementation of the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023, which aims to introduce a one-third reservation for women in the Lok Sabha, state legislative assemblies, and the Delhi legislative assembly. This adjournment, set until […]
New Delhi, Jan 12: In a significant development, the Supreme Court, led by Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta, declined to entertain a plea advocating for the urgent and time-bound implementation of the Women’s Reservation Law. This law, aimed at ensuring a 33 percent quota for women, was proposed to be enforced in the upcoming […]
States’ Response is Deadline Set In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India, on January 12, 2024, expressed its dissatisfaction with certain state governments for not submitting their affidavits and responses regarding the district-wise identification of minorities. This issue arose during the hearing of a series of public interest litigation (PIL) petitions that sought […]