NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court of India on Thursday (23rd Jan) expressed its dissatisfaction when a lawyer requested an adjournment in a criminal case. The Bench, comprising Justices PS Narasimha and Manoj Misra, highlighted the prolonged incarceration of the lawyer’s client, emphasizing the need for prompt justice.
NEW DELHI: On January 20, 2025, the Supreme Court of India refused to entertain a writ petition that sought the establishment of a dedicated Ministry for senior citizens. The petition, filed by Advocate G Priyadharshi, a lawyer and social worker, was withdrawn after the Court allowed the petitioner to make a representation to the relevant government ministries instead.
Today, On 5th August, The Supreme Court’s recent ruling on the lieutenant governor’s authority to nominate aldermen to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi could intensify the turf war between AAP and BJP. The ruling may hamper the AAP’s efforts to secure funds from the standing committee and strain the relationship between the LG’s office and the AAP-led Delhi government.
![[NLSIU 25% Domicile Reservation] Karnataka Withdraws Appeal Before Supreme Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-19-3.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Karnataka Government today withdrew its plea challenging the 25 percent domicile reservation for Karnataka students at NLSIU. The High Court’s ruling against the Amendment Act led to this decision. NLSIU had independently implemented the reservation, rendering the plea unnecessary. The Supreme Court refused to stay NLSIU’s decision, leading to the withdrawal of the appeal.
Today, 21st May, The Supreme Court dismissed a plea for re-evaluation of Punjab Judicial Services Mains Exam marks, citing lack of authority. Petitioners requested reconsideration based on discrepancies, but the Court upheld the existing process and advised them to approach the Punjab & Haryana High Court under Article 226 for redress, subsequently granting permission to withdraw the petition.
![[Empowering Junior Lawyers] SC Stresses Significance of Junior Lawyers in Vacation Bench Arguments](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/image-7-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 20th May, The Supreme Court emphasized the need for junior lawyers to argue before vacation benches. This allows them to gain experience and advance professionally. The Court urged senior lawyers to support this initiative, highlighting the importance of providing opportunities for young legal professionals. Emphasis was also placed on the role of senior lawyers in mentoring and training junior members of the legal profession.
Today, On 15th May, The Supreme Court set guidelines for government land acquisitions to ensure fairness and transparency. The ruling emphasizes procedures to respect property rights. The decision affects land acquisition practices nationwide. In a specific case, the Kolkata Municipal Corporation’s land acquisition was deemed illegal, highlighting the significance of adhering to the established principles.