The Supreme Court of India ruled that the electoral bonds scheme violated the right to information and free speech, dismissing a review petition against its earlier decision. The scheme’s anonymity favored the ruling party and undermined accountability. The Court mandated disclosure of all related financial details by the State Bank of India and the Election Commission.
NEW DELHI: On Friday (8th Feb): The Supreme Court of India has raised concerns over a “deadlock” caused by Tamil Nadu Governor R N Ravi not taking a decision on bills passed by the legislative assembly. The court questioned how the state government could function if the Governor neither approved nor communicated his reasons for withholding assent.
The Supreme Court today (21st Oct) has refused to stay the ongoing Telangana Public Service Commission exam for 563 Grade-I posts, citing potential chaos if postponed. This decision follows concerns over a disputed quota policy raised by advocate Kapil Sibal. The exams started on October 21 and will run until October 27, with around 31,383 candidates participating.
The Supreme Court today is set to consider urgent pleas regarding whether a husband can be prosecuted for rape if he coerces his adult wife into sex. Senior advocate Indira Jaising emphasized the need for swift action. Legal debates over marital rape exceptions in Indian law have been ongoing, with implications for women’s rights.
The Supreme Court instructed today (17th Sept) the CBI to provide an update on the R G Kar Medical College and Hospital case, emphasizing the importance of public interest and transparency. They also refused to halt live proceedings despite concerns raised by the West Bengal government. The Court stressed the need to protect the victim’s identity and instructed Wikipedia to remove sensitive information. Additionally, the CBI was asked to submit a status report on the financial irregularities in medical departments. The case involves the rape and murder of a 31-year-old doctor, leading to multiple unresolved questions and investigations into potential corruption and evidence tampering.
The Supreme Court agreed to consider Punjab government’s plea for urgent release of over Rs 1,000 crore from the Centre, related to Rural Development Fund dues. The state seeks immediate funds as an interim measure, claiming the Centre owes Punjab over Rs 4,200 crore. Lawyer Shadan Farasat appealed for an early hearing, which was accepted by Chief Justice Chandrachud.
The Supreme Court today rejected Divya Spandana’s plea to dismiss a defamation case against Asianet News Network and journalist Vishweshwar Bhat. Spandana filed the lawsuit over allegations implicating her in a betting and spot-fixing scandal, claiming her name was repeatedly mentioned during the telecasts. Both the Karnataka High Court and the Supreme Court upheld the decision not to quash the proceedings.
The Supreme Court today extended the stay on notices summoning West Bengal officials until July 19 due to the unavailability of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta. The notices were related to an alleged breach of privilege by them regarding their response to a complaint filed by a BJP MP. The court will continue addressing the plea on July 19.
Today, On 2nd May, In the Supreme Court, a significant case concerning the promotion of judicial officers has emerged, sparking widespread interest, the appointment of senior civil judges as additional district and sessions judges and the interpretation of Rule 5(1)(1). Suspension of promotions and calls for a Constitution bench highlight the case’s significance. The court also seeks clarification on promotion criteria, emphasizing the importance of interpreting rules.
