![[Kerala Gold Smuggling Case]"What is the Procedure for Indian Govt to Scan a Diplomatic Package?": SC to Centre](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-358.png?resize=447%2C309&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court termed an appeal as a “legal misadventure” and imposed a penalty of Rs 1.2 lakh on the appellant for pursuing a loan dispute case. The court criticized the wastage of judicial time and directed the penalty to be deposited within six weeks, with specific allocations for welfare and legal aid. The case involved a loan dispute and mortgage of properties.
Today, On 28th August,, the Supreme Court intervened to assist PSU employees facing potential termination due to changes in their reserved category status. The Court ruled against the termination notices issued by the banks and undertakings, ensuring protection for employees affected by caste reclassification in Karnataka. This decision sets aside a previous judgment by the Karnataka High Court.
Today, On 13th July, The Centre informed the Supreme Court of progress on a dashboard for Internal Complaints Committees under the POSH Act. The Court noted inadequate formation of ICCs, emphasizing the need for a dashboard. It urged all states to adopt this initiative to reduce reliance on manpower and human intervention. The case was adjourned for four weeks to allow for comprehensive compliance affidavits.
The Managing Director of Patanjali Ayurveda, Acharya Balkrishna, filed a plea against the President of the Indian Medical Association (IMA), Dr. RV Asokan, for disparaging remarks about the Supreme Court. This arises from the Court’s criticism of IMA’s unethical practices. Simultaneously, the Supreme Court is hearing a petition by IMA against Patanjali Ayurveda for misleading advertisements.
Today (9th, April), Yoga guru Ramdev and Patanjali Ayurved Ltd’s Managing Director Acharya Balkrishna submitted an “unconditional and unqualified apology” to the Supreme Court for exaggerating product claims. The court previously criticized their apologies, emphasizing adherence to legal commitments. The Supreme Court (SC) is set to hear the case on April 10th.
Supreme Court Criticizes Gujarat High Court’s Bail Order Based on Personal Settlement in Murder Case The Supreme Court has expressed its astonishment and concern over a decision by the Gujarat High Court that granted bail to a murder accused based on a ‘personal settlement’ with the son of the deceased victim. The apex court’s bench, […]
