Today, On 29th July, The Supreme Court upheld the NCDRC’s decision, ordering a builder to refund home buyers for delayed possession of flats. The court increased the interest rate to 12 percent, emphasizing the buyer’s prolonged suffering. The ruling requires the developer to refund the entire amount with 12 percent interest and compensate the buyers within three months.
![[Forest Fires in Uttarakhand] "Before The Next Season, You Must Put Everything in Place": SC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/shared-image.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 23rd July, The Supreme Court mandated that all necessary steps be taken to prevent forest fires in Uttarakhand before the upcoming season. This directive emphasizes the urgency and importance of proactive measures to protect the region’s forests. New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday emphasized the need for authorities to prepare measures to […]
The Supreme Court reiterated that judgments by Constitution Benches are binding on smaller benches, ensuring consistent judicial rulings. A recent ruling emphasized the need to follow precedents, annulling a decision that contradicted a previous Constitution bench judgment. This upholds the hierarchical structure of the judiciary and ensures uniform application of constitutional principles.
Today, On 14th May, The Supreme Court dismissed a PIL alleging Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal misused the names of national icons for political gains. The court found no merit in the claims, stating they lacked substantial evidence. The dismissal reflects the court’s stance on avoiding politically charged issues without a strong legal basis.
Recently Supreme Court Criticizes Judicial Impropriety in Bail Cancellation Case. The controversy began when the Madhya Pradesh High Court, on December 12, 2023, revoked the bail granted to the accused appellants on September 8 and 14, 2022, by another bench. On February 20, 2024, the Supreme Court of India, through a bench comprising Justices B […]
The Supreme Court has directed Jammu and Kashmir to publicly release review orders of the committee overseeing internet restoration, emphasizing transparency. This follows a 2020 order to assess internet restrictions, with the petitioner criticizing Jammu and Kashmir’s resistance. The move aims to ensure accountability and adherence to procedures and raises concerns about transparency and compliance.
