Bribery conviction set aside: the Supreme Court cleared a former Assistant in the Saraikela District Education Office who had already served his four-year sentence, holding that demand and acceptance of the Rs 5,000 bribe were never proved.
A sitting Supreme Court judge should not have delivered a verdict from a moot court podium on a matter listed before his own Court the next morning. That does not make what he said wrong, and the Commission has spent a week proving it.
Sikkim child rape-murder case: the Supreme Court acquitted a man serving life imprisonment, holding that the last-seen evidence was doubtful, the recovery was from an open spot and the DNA report showed the recovered bones were of male origin.
Holding that a missing ticket cannot by itself defeat a claim for railway compensation, the Supreme Court has restored a Rs 8 lakh award to the parents of a man who died after falling from a train near Ahmedabad, setting aside the Gujarat High Court’s reversal. New Delhi: The Supreme Court has held that the […]
Justice Ujjal Bhuyan of the Supreme Court said any process disenfranchising millions of citizens is intrinsically arbitrary, violates Articles 14 and 326, and that Article 326 cannot be tinkered with by any authority or condoned by any court.
A Bench of Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and Atul S. Chandurkar has set aside the Madhya Pradesh High Court’s refusal of regular bail to Kanha @ Kanhaiya Singh in a POCSO and SC/ST Act case, holding that courts must not impose a judge’s views on morality in bail matters, and directing his release on bail after over a year in custody, subject to his custody in a connected conviction appeal.
A Special Bench of Justice Manoj Misra and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan has listed the CAPF officers’ contempt case with the challenge to the CAPF Act on October 15, to examine whether the 2025 judgment’s directions stand independent of the new law, after ASG Aishwarya Bhati apologised for seeking a combined listing before the CJI without informing the petitioners.
The Supreme Court has directed its Registry to explain why the CAPF officers’ contempt petition against the Union Home Secretary was struck off the cause list despite a judicial order listing it for September 29, and has relisted the matter for September 30 at 2 PM.
A day after Justice Ujjal Bhuyan’s Bench sought an explanation from the Supreme Court Registry for dropping the CAPF officers’ contempt petitions from the cause list, the matter has been listed before a Special Bench of Justice Manoj Misra and Justice Bhuyan.
The Supreme Court has acquitted a Patwari, since deceased, in a Prevention of Corruption Act bribe-trap case, holding that proof of both the demand and the acceptance of illegal gratification is a sine qua non for conviction under Sections 7 and 13 of the Act. With the complainant having died before deposing and the shadow witness turning hostile, no witness saw the demand or the handing-over of the money, and the recovery of tainted currency alone could not sustain the conviction.
