The Karnataka High Court ruled that the law against marital cruelty also applies to live-in relationships. It clarified that the term ‘husband’ under Section 498A of the IPC includes partners in relationships with marital traits.
The Karnataka High Court, led by Justice Suraj Govindaraj, ruled that law students who failed the Indian Penal Code (IPC) exam cannot be forced to sit for supplementary exams in Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which they were not taught. The court emphasized the need for students to take IPC exams instead.
Karnataka High Court emphasized the need for a thorough inquiry before altering ownership records concerning private property. In a case involving disputed land, the court ruled in favor of a petitioner whose ownership claim was challenged by the Wakf Board. The court highlighted the burden of proof on the Board and directed a proper legal process for resolving the dispute.
The Supreme Court today upheld the Karnataka High Court’s decision not to dismiss a petition challenging the election of Congress MLA NA Haris. The Court advised that all arguments should be presented before the High Court. The case stemmed from allegations that Haris’ nomination papers were unlawfully accepted, though he maintained there was no evidence to support this.
The Karnataka High Court dismissed petitions from Ola and Uber challenging the 5% service charge cap for app-based autorickshaws. The ruling supports consumer protection and fair pricing, providing significant relief to Bengaluru commuters. The court emphasized the government’s authority in regulating these services, leading to the dismissal of the petitions.