NEW DELHI: Today, 4th Feb: The Supreme Court of India has clarified that High Courts can continue hearing petitions challenging the amendments made to the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). This decision was made by a Bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna, Justice PV Sanjay Kumar, and Justice KV Viswanathan.
![[BREAKING] Supreme Court May Transfer CLAT 2025 Result Petitions to Punjab and Haryana High Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CLAT-2025.webp?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 10th January, The Supreme Court ruled against allowing puja at the well located within Sambhal’s Jama Masjid amid an ongoing temple-mosque dispute. The court emphasized maintaining the status quo while addressing the sensitive matter. It has also issued a notice to the Uttar Pradesh government, seeking its response on the issue. The case highlights the judicial approach to balancing religious sentiments and legal considerations.
The Supreme Court of India is examining the adverse effects of stay orders on criminal trials, as delays hinder timely justice. A hearing is scheduled for December 9, led by Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna. The Court emphasizes the need for judicial oversight to balance justice with the rights of the accused.
The Supreme Court reserved its verdict on petitions challenging the inclusion of “socialist” and “secular” in the Indian Constitution’s Preamble, scheduled for November 25. CJI Sanjiv Khanna emphasized secularism as a core constitutional aspect and noted prior judicial review of the 42nd Amendment, rejecting claims of its unconstitutionality during the Emergency.
![[Roche vs Zydus] Apex Court Refuses To Revoke Injunction Against Sale Of Zydus Lifesciences' Breast Cancer Drug](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Zydus-Lifesciences_-Zydus-barred-from-selling-cancer-biosimilar-for-now-The-Economic-Times.png?resize=420%2C315&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court on Monday(18th Nov) directed the Delhi High Court to swiftly resolve a patent dispute involving Zydus Lifesciences’ breast cancer drug, ‘Sigrima.’ Roche alleges patent infringement, with an interim injunction restraining Zydus from selling the drug. The Court emphasized the real-world impact of judicial decisions while maintaining the injunction until a December hearing.
The Supreme Court on Monday (18th Nov) has issued a notice to the Centre regarding the non-appointment of chairpersons in 11 Debt Recovery Tribunals (DRTs), seeking a response within five weeks. The case highlights delays affecting efficient debt recovery, emphasizing the right to speedy justice and requesting interim measures to ensure tribunal functionality while vacancies persist.
![[BREAKING] SC Reserves Order on AAP Leader Manish Sisodia's Bail Pleas in CBI, ED Cases](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/manish-3.jpeg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
![[Breaking] ED Reveals Rs 45 Crores Traced and Digital Evidence in Manish Sisodia's Bail Plea Before Supreme Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-56.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today(on 6th July), at the 4th Justice HR Khanna Memorial National Symposium, Justice PV Sanjay Kumar stressed the need for recusal to maintain judicial impartiality. He emphasized his commitment to fairness by avoiding cases with any personal connections. He also highlighted the calling of judgeship, the significance of the Basic Structure doctrine, and the evolving nature of the legal landscape.
