The Delhi High Court today granted bail to Arun Pillai in a money laundering case tied to the Delhi excise policy, with allegations of receiving and passing on bribes. Pillai is associated with BRS leader K Kavitha, also an accused. This comes in the wake of multiple bail grants and accusations against a liquor cartel and political figures.
The Delhi High Court upheld Tihar Jail’s decision to deny AAP MP Sandeep Pathak permission to meet Arvind Kejriwal, citing his political statements during a previous visit as a breach of prison rules. Pathak was criticized for acting as Kejriwal’s spokesperson, and the court stated that future visitation applications would be considered in accordance with the law.
![[Rape Case] HC Upholds Lower Court Decision, Grants Major Relief to BJP Leader Shahnawaz Hussain](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-3-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Delhi High Court upheld the lower court’s decision to quash the police FIR against BJP leader Shahnawaz Hussain in a rape case, providing significant relief. The court found no errors and dismissed the complainant’s revision petition, citing evidence that contradicted the allegations. This ruling was issued on Friday.
The Delhi High Court today has reserved its verdict on Arvind Kejriwal’s bail plea regarding the excise policy case. The CBI identified Kejriwal as the central figure in the excise policy case and has submitted its final chargesheet. Kejriwal’s judicial custody has been extended, and he has sought bail due to lack of new evidence.
![[Money Laundering Case] Plea Against Satyendar Jain's Trial Court Summons| Delhi HC Seeks ED Reply](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-30-4.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 25th July, The Delhi High Court issued a notice to the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in response to a petition filed by Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Satyendar Jain, challenging a trial court’s summons in a money laundering case. Despite ED’s opposition, the High Court proceeded to issue a formal notice. Jain remains incarcerated in connection with the case.
Today, On 22nd July, The Delhi High Court instructed Subramanian Swamy, Sonia Gandhi, and Rahul Gandhi to submit written arguments in the National Herald case within four weeks. Any submissions after this period will incur a cost of Rs 15,000. The court scheduled the case for arguments on October 29, following a plea from Swamy seeking to present evidence.
The Delhi High Court today has reserved its verdict on jailed Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s plea for additional meetings with his legal team. Kejriwal cited the numerous legal cases he faces as justification. Tihar Jail authorities oppose the request, arguing against special treatment. The court sought responses from the jail and the Enforcement Directorate.
Today(on 17th July),The Delhi High Court has reserved its judgment on Arvind Kejriwal’s arrest plea by the CBI related to alleged irregularities in the 2021-22 Delhi excise policy. Arguments include accusations of “insurance arrest” and lack of legal adherence in the arrest. The next bail plea hearing is set for July 29. Kejriwal maintains he is entitled to release based on previous interim orders.
![[Excise Policy Case] Delhi HC Seeks CBI Response on Arvind Kejriwal's Bail Plea](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/image-3-4.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Delhi High Court has requested the CBI’s response to Arvind Kejriwal’s bail plea related to a corruption case. Kejriwal was arrested in connection to the excise policy ‘scam’ and the court has set July 17 as the next hearing date. The case involves allegations of irregularities and corruption in the excise policy.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the 17-year-old defamation lawsuits filed by IFS officer Mahaveer Singhvi against Hindustan Times, its editors, and reporters. The court ruled that the articles were not inherently defamatory and fairly reported verified news. It also emphasized that a single incident should not severely damage one’s reputation, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the defamation claim.