Anastasia Oberoi, daughter of PRS Oberoi, filed a lawsuit in Delhi High Court against her brother, sister, and cousin, accusing them of impeding the execution of their father’s will. The court issued an interim order in favor of Anastasia, prohibiting the transfer of shares held by PRS Oberoi. Legal representatives engaged in the case.
The Delhi High Court today declined interim relief to Jyotir Peeth Shankaracharya Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in his defamation suit against Swami Govindananda Saraswati. The judge commented that saints should rise above such allegations and emphasized that saints command respect through their own deeds. Further consideration is scheduled for August 29.
The Delhi High Court emphasized that trial courts must have the conviction judgment prepared before declaring an accused guilty. This ruling came after a case where two men were ordered into custody before the judgment was ready. The court directed District and Sessions Judges to ensure proper procedures to safeguard the rights of the accused.
The Delhi High Court revoked a bail order in a rape case due to the alleged victim not being given the opportunity to be heard, violating her rights. The court highlighted the importance of the victim’s participation in judicial proceedings, emphasizing the need to uphold their rights at every stage following the offense. The accused must submit a new bail application within two weeks.
The Delhi High Court ruled that property seized under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act must be returned within 365 days if no prosecution complaint is filed. This reinforces the balance between law enforcement and individual rights. The decision reflects a cautious approach towards the exercise of power by enforcement agencies, emphasizing respect for the rule of law.
The Delhi High Court emphasized the constitutional limits on seizing property under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), stressing the importance of protecting individuals’ rights and avoiding excessive use of authority during lengthy investigations. This ruling sets a precedent for returning seized property after a certain duration, maintaining a balance between law enforcement and individual rights.