The Delhi High Court upheld a law mandating 50% coverage of health warnings on pan masala packaging to inform consumers about its harmful effects. The ruling aimed to promote public health and increase consumer awareness. The Court dismissed a plea by a pan masala company, emphasizing the regulation’s proportionate nature and its alignment with public interest.
The Indian Government has formed a UAPA Tribunal, led by Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora of the Delhi High Court, to assess the continuation of the LTTE ban for another 5 years. The Ministry of Home Affairs cited the LTTE’s persistence in promoting separatism and anti-India propaganda as grounds for the extension.
Today, On 15th May, The Delhi High Court warned the Delhi government over delayed textbook distribution in government schools, threatening contempt action. The government pledged to deliver textbooks by May 10 but failed, prompting the court’s criticism. Despite refraining from immediate action, the court demanded timely textbook supply to all schools and a compliance report on corrective measures.
Today, On 9th May, The Delhi High Court instructed Google and Microsoft to file a review petition challenging an order to remove non-consensual intimate images from their platforms. This decision aims to address concerns about privacy and unauthorized content circulation. The directive underscores the ongoing legal debates on online content moderation and user protection, highlighting the complex interplay of technology, law, and personal privacy.
Today, 2nd May, The Delhi High Court rejected a PIL challenging the introduction of a four-year LL.B program, emphasizing that educational policy matters do not warrant judicial interference. The court highlighted the need for a broader legal education, incorporating non-legal subjects and understanding the interconnected nature of various fields. The petitioner withdrew the petition following the court’s indication of dismissal.
Today, 18th April, The Delhi High Court invalidated a Central government circular banning specific “ferocious dog” breeds due to lack of private stakeholder consultation. They ordered a new circular after public objections were considered. The Karnataka High Court also set aside a similar circular on April 10. The ban included breeds like Pitbull Terrier, Rottweiler, and Mastiffs.
Yesterday, 4th April,The Delhi HC supported Reliance Industries’ involvement in the BPCL-HPCL pipeline case, dismissing BPCL’s appeal. The dispute revolves around the pipeline being designated as a common carrier, contested by PSU oil companies. Reliance’s participation, based on its initiation of the process, approved despite objections from the oil companies.
The Delhi High Court affirmed High Courts’ authority over tribunal decisions, ruling on a PIL challenging statutes bypassing High Courts and sending appeals directly to the Supreme Court. The Delhi High Court has recently delivered a pivotal judgment affirming the enduring writ jurisdiction of High Courts against decisions made by various tribunals. In a case […]
On Wednesday, the Delhi High Court turned down a request for reconsideration of a decision that dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) targeting Truecaller, accusing the global caller ID platform of infringing on the privacy rights of Indian citizens. Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, presiding over a division bench, rejected […]
The Delhi High Court also noted that subjecting medical practitioners to the regulatory authority of the State Medical Council where they practice serves the public interest. This approach allows the relevant Council to hold practitioners accountable for any misconduct and to undertake disciplinary actions in accordance with the law. The Delhi High Court has recently […]