Today(on 8th July),The Supreme Court, led by Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan, dismissed West Bengal’s Special Leave Petition challenging a High Court directive for a CBI investigation into allegations in Sandeshkhali. Despite the State’s request for a deferral, the Court upheld the broader scope of the investigation, encompassing multiple FIRs including those related to the Ration Scam.
Supreme Court Justice Surya Kant stressed the necessity of safeguarding free speech, especially for journalists and the media. He emphasized the crucial link between freedom of speech and leading a dignified life, and the courts’ disapproval of attempts to curtail this right. The event also featured discussions on protecting the media’s rights within constitutional limits.
The Supreme Court of India declined to entertain a plea on Monday (4th March) for a Minimum Support Price (MSP) for farmers, citing it as a policy decision for the government. The plea aimed to secure fair income for farmers and ensure dignified treatment, amidst ongoing protests. The Court emphasized the separation of powers and advised thorough research before filing petitions. The ongoing farmer protests have resulted in clashes with the police, leading to legal actions and demands for criminal investigations. The Supreme Court’s landmark judgment in Anuradha Bhasin vs. Union of India laid down guidelines emphasizing reasonable and proportionate restrictions on the internet, the importance of Freedom of Press, and the need for a legal framework governing internet shutdowns.
Supreme Court Upholds Registrar’s Decision on Special Leave Petition Against Administrative HC Order In a recent development, the Supreme Court has made a significant observation regarding the scope of special leave petitions (SLPs). The apex court noted that an SLP challenging an order passed by the High Court on the administrative side is not permissible. […]
