The Kerala High Court ruled that public prosecutors must independently evaluate cases before seeking withdrawal under Section 321 of the CrPC, rather than merely following government directives. Justice K. Babu emphasized the importance of assessing evidence to ensure public interest is served. The court dismissed a petition challenging a trial court’s decision to continue prosecution.
Today, On 18th June, The Kerala High Court issued a notice to Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, his daughter Veena Thaikkandiyil, and her firm Exalogic Solutions regarding alleged corruption in financial transactions with Cochin Mineral and Rutile Ltd. Congress MLA Mathew Kuzhalnadan’s plea challenges a vigilance court’s dismissal and is scheduled for the next hearing on July 2. Another petition and a separate investigation are also pending.
In 2017, a prominent actress was allegedly abducted and sexually assaulted, leading to an ongoing trial involving actor Dileep. The victim has petitioned the Kerala High Court to investigate unauthorized access to crucial evidence, seeking a fairer process after deeming the initial inquiry inadequate. The case is set for further examination on May 30th.
The Kerala High Court, in a significant move, has appointed an amicus curiae to aid in the examination of a plea that challenges the decision of the Vigilance Special Court in Muvattupuzha. The court had earlier dismissed the probe into the purported illicit financial transactions between Cochin Minerals and Rutile Limited (CMRL) and Chief Minister […]
