Supreme Court: Justice Sheel Nagu Recuses From Hearing Punjab’s Appeal Against High Court Order For CBI Probe Linked To CM’s Office

Justice Sheel Nagu of the Supreme Court has recused from hearing the State of Punjab’s appeal against the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s order directing a CBI probe into allegations linked to the Chief Minister’s office [State of Punjab v. Nikhil Saraf]. New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday saw Justice Sheel Nagu recuse from […]

Supreme Court Justice Datta Orally Questions Death Penalty Commutations, Says Court’s Forgiving Nature Must End Somewhere

Justice Dipankar Datta of the Supreme Court has orally questioned the Court’s practice on death penalty commutations, remarking in a remission matter that the Court’s forgiving nature has to come to an end somewhere. New Delhi: Hearing a remission matter involving a convict in a murder case on Thursday (October 8), Justice Dipankar Datta of […]

Supreme Court Adjourns Punjab’s Plea Against High Court Order For CBI Probe Linked To CM’s Office

The Supreme Court has adjourned the State of Punjab’s challenge to the High Court order directing a CBI probe linked to the Chief Minister’s office, after the file reached one of the judges late. New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday adjourned the plea of the State of Punjab against the Punjab and Haryana High […]

Supreme Court Recall Plea: Justice Sharma Did Not Disclose Son’s ECI Counsel Role, Applicants Allege

A recall application alleges Justice Satish Chandra Sharma did not disclose, during the CEC appointment law hearings, that his son is the Election Commission’s standing counsel before the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The allegation is the applicants’ own; the Court has made no finding.

Supreme Court: CJI To Examine Application Seeking Recall Of Split Verdict On CEC Appointment Law

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant has said the Court will examine an application seeking recall of the split verdict on the CEC appointment law, which alleges an apprehension of bias against one of the two judges. New Delhi: The Supreme Court will examine an interlocutory application seeking recall of the September 23 split verdict […]

Supreme Court: Civil Suit Cannot Seek Reinstatement, Employee Can Amend Plaint To Claim Damages

A Civil Suit Cannot Seek Reinstatement of a terminated employee, the Supreme Court has held, since a contract of personal service cannot be specifically enforced; the employee, however, may still claim damages. New Delhi: The Supreme Court has revived an employee’s suit against Tata Communications Ltd after the plaint was rejected, holding that reinstatement cannot […]

Supreme Court Upholds Recovery Of Excess Pay From NIT Calicut Teachers Who Gave Written Undertakings

Teachers who signed undertakings to refund benefits released by mistake cannot resist later demands to return them: recovery of excess pay is permissible in such cases, the Supreme Court has held while dismissing appeals by lecturers of the National Institute of Technology. New Delhi: The Supreme Court has dismissed a batch of appeals by teachers […]

Supreme Court Grants Bail To Sanjay Badaya, Shubhanshu Dixit In Jal Jeevan Mission Tender Case

Jal Jeevan Mission bail: the Supreme Court released Sanjay Badaya and former RWSSMB Secretary Shubhanshu Dixit in the ACB case over tenders worth Rs 979.45 crore, holding that pre-trial incarceration cannot become punishment when trial is far off.

Supreme Court Restores Rs 5 Lakh Per Acre For Fazilka Drain Land, Rejects Radial Pricing

Land acquisition compensation: the Supreme Court restored a uniform Rs 5 lakh per acre and 50% severance charges for land acquired for the Aspal Extension Drain in Fazilka, setting aside the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s radial step-down valuation.

Curative Petition Seeks Recall Of Supreme Court’s Split Verdict On CEC Appointment Law Over Recusal Ground

Dr. Jaya Thakur has filed a curative petition in the Supreme Court seeking recall of the September 23 split verdict in the challenge to the 2023 law on the appointment of the CEC and Election Commissioners, contending that Justice Satish Chandra Sharma should not have heard the case because his son has been a standing counsel for the Election Commission of India before the Madhya Pradesh High Court since July 2024.