At his farewell, Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma discussed his judicial transfer to the Calcutta High Court, acknowledging opposition from Kolkata lawyers but expressing no resentment. Bar Council vice-chairman Ved Prakash Sharma emphasized the importance of judicial transfers for independence. Justice Sharma highlighted the judge’s duty to maintain the law’s connection with the people.
Today, On 7th June, The Delhi High Court considering a student’s plea against the National Testing Agency’s decision to award grace marks in the NEET UG 2024 exam. The petitioner argues that this move unfairly affects many students. The court has requested NTA’s response. Similar concerns have arisen in the Calcutta High Court, indicating wider controversy and legal action.
The Supreme Court of India, on Monday, declined to consider the plea by the Popular Front of India (PFI) to overturn the central government’s decision to impose a five-year ban on the organization and its eight affiliates. The bench, comprising Justices Aniruddha Bose and Bela M Trivedi, suggested the petitioner approach the High Court instead. […]
In a recent development, the Delhi High Court has granted bail to two former Uttar Pradesh Police officers, Ashok Singh Bhadauria and Kamta Prasad Singh, who were previously convicted in the case concerning the custodial death of the father of the Unnao rape survivor. The decision was made by Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma. The two […]
![[NEET UG 2024 Controversy] NTA Seeks Transfer of All HC Cases to SC: Delhi HC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/image-92.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
