NEW DELHI: Two senior judges of the Supreme Court of India, Justice BR Gavai and Justice Surya Kant, have traveled to Kenya to discuss issues related to justice delivery with their counterparts. They will be attending a week-long judicial event from March 7 to March 15 in Kenya.
Former CJI Chandrachud defended the Supreme Court’s verdict on Article 370, stating that the provision was always meant to fade away. In an interview with the BBC, he highlighted that it was introduced as a temporary measure due to war conditions. He emphasized that the Court upheld the elected government’s decision to abrogate it. According to him, the ruling aligns with the constitutional framework and historical context.
Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna highlighted the importance of a strong Bar for an effective judiciary, advocating for a minimum stipend for junior lawyers to combat financial insecurity. He emphasized the essential role of lawyers in the justice system, the need for alternative dispute resolution, and collective responsibility in addressing legal challenges.
Today, On 11th November, Justice Sanjiv Khanna will be sworn in as the 51st Chief Justice of India on November 11, 2024, succeeding Justice D.Y. Chandrachud. His term lasts until May 13, 2025. Khanna is recognized for significant rulings and aims to improve justice delivery while continuing a family legacy in India’s judiciary.
Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal on Sunday (September 1) called for collective efforts to break the perception of the Indian judiciary system that it suffers from the “taarikh pe taarikh culture” and also asserted such efforts will strengthen the trust factor among citizens. The Minister also proposed a critical analysis of ‘aging of pending litigation’.
The Karnataka High Court ruled that saying “go hang yourself” does not automatically amount to abetment of suicide under the Indian Penal Code. Complexities of the human mind and varied reasons for suicide were highlighted. The court quashed a case against a man accused of abetment, emphasizing the difficulty in understanding motives behind suicide.
Today (1st May): The Delhi High Court has sought a response from the Centre in relation to a plea from the Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA) calling for the expansion of the High Court building. The plea underlines the need for more space to cater to the court’s growing requirements, emphasizing the necessity for additional courtrooms, lawyers’ chambers, and essential infrastructure facilities. The Court has highlighted the challenges faced in expanding the premises and stressed the urgency of obtaining adjacent land for the expansion. The plea also addresses the congestion and inconvenience caused by inadequate parking space in the vicinity. The expansion and modernization of the Delhi High Court are crucial to meet the escalating demands of the judicial system and ensure the efficient delivery of justice.
Today (25th April): Chief Justice Chandrachud criticized certain High Courts for imposing restrictions on accessing video-conferencing links, calling it a hindrance to judicial accessibility. He emphasized the operational benefits of virtual hearings and the need to remove unnecessary barriers. The judiciary’s investment in digitization is crucial for equitable access to justice.
