Justice B.V. Nagarathna expressed concerns that delimitation based on population could diminish parliamentary representation for southern states, which are experiencing declining family sizes. During a hearing on surrogacy, she questioned the necessity for couples seeking to expand their families after natural conception, emphasizing personal choice and suggesting High Court alternatives.
Today, On 27th January, The Supreme Court dismissed a PIL challenging the misuse of anti-dowry and domestic violence laws, emphasizing that lawyers should avoid becoming litigants. “An advocate must always avoid being a litigant,” the Court remarked, directing Advocate Vishal Tiwari to withdraw the plea. The Court’s statement highlights the importance of maintaining professionalism and impartiality in the legal field. Tiwari ultimately chose to withdraw the petition following the Court’s observation.
The Supreme Court has restructured its Gender Sensitisation and Internal Complaints Committee, appointing Justice B.V. Nagarathna as chairperson. The 11-member panel includes notable advocates and representatives tasked with addressing gender discrimination and related issues, following the retirement of Justice Hima Kohli. Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud initiated this reconstitution.
Justice Nagarathna believes that the judiciary becomes truly representative when more women are on the bench. She elaborates that this inclusivity aligns with the principles of justice and the Constitution, ensuring diverse perspectives in adjudication. Justice BV Nagarathna, soon to make history as the first woman Chief Justice of India (CJI), shared her thoughts on her journey, her father’s inspiring legacy, and the evolving judicial system in India.
The Supreme Court on Thursday (19th Dec) stayed the Kerala High Court’s directives regulating elephant usage in temple festivals, deeming them “impractical” and outside the High Court’s authority. This decision grants temporary relief to festival organizers, allowing adherence to the 2012 management rules. Further hearings will address the legality and implications of these restrictions.
![[BREAKING] Supreme Court Reconstitutes Gender Sensitisation Committee to Address Gender Equality and Harassment Issues](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/B.V-Nagarathna.webp?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
