Justice B.R. Gavai criticized the Supreme Court for its lack of discipline, calling it “the most undisciplined court” compared to the organized High Courts. He pointed out disruptive behavior among lawyers during proceedings and reiterated prior concerns about orderliness. Gavai is set to become India’s second Dalit Chief Justice in May 2025.
The Supreme Court Today (Nov 26) called for creative ways to deal with unruly air passengers, while asking the authorities to consider modifying the existing guidelines in accordance with the international norms. The Bench was hearing a plea moved by a 72-year-old woman who was urinated on by a man on board an Air India flight in 2022. “Something creative will have to be done. May be strategic seating or something,” the Court remarked.
Justice S. Ravindra Bhat’s retirement on October 20 allowed Justice A.S. Oka to join the Supreme Court Collegium, now led by Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna. This reorganization follows the former Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud’s retirement. The collegium plays a vital role in judicial appointments, impacting transparency and autonomy in the Indian judiciary.
The Supreme Court today (23rd Oct) highlighted the necessity of enhancing legal aid awareness for prisoners by mandating the display of legal aid information in public places. The court urged collaboration between legal services authorities to implement effective aid frameworks, promote local language literature, and conduct campaigns, ensuring access to justice for all, especially the marginalized.
Justice B.R. Gavai highlighted the critical role of judicial ethics and integrity at a conference in Gujarat, stressing that a judge’s conduct affects public trust. He warned that resigning to contest elections could harm perceptions of impartiality and emphasized the judiciary’s independence from other branches to maintain credibility and prevent justice delays.
The Supreme Court today emphasized the need to establish Gram Nyayalayas nationwide to improve access to justice. The bench led by Justice B.R. Gavai reviewed a petition urging the Centre and states to act under the court’s supervision. Only a small percentage of these courts have been established, prompting the Court to demand immediate action.
Today, On 29th August, The Supreme Court Criticized Telangana Chief Minister for alleging a deal behind a bail grant, stressing the need to uphold judicial integrity and avoid undermining public trust. The Court criticized the CM’s comments, emphasizing the importance of mutual respect between institutions and refraining from involving political rivalry in judicial matters.
The Supreme Court of India today rejected a PIL seeking to declare the caste system unconstitutional. Chief Justice Chandrachud stated that the Constitution acknowledges Scheduled Tribes and Scheduled Castes, dismissing the plea. Additionally, a recent landmark decision revised the framework for SC and ST reservations, allowing states to create sub-classifications within these groups.
![[Judicial Backlog] Supreme Court Demands Immediate Gram Nyayalayas Implementation](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-73-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 12th July, The Supreme Court directed the immediate establishment of Gram Nyayalayas nationwide to address judicial backlog and provide faster justice in rural areas. Emphasizing affordable and accessible legal recourse, the court instructed state authorities to submit details on the establishment and functioning of these courts within six weeks. Currently, only 264 out of an expected 6,000 Gram Nyayalayas have been operational since the Act’s passage in 2008. This intervention underscores the urgent need to prioritize the implementation of Gram Nyayalayas to improve access to justice and alleviate the burden on higher courts.
Today, On 16th May, The Supreme Court stressed the crucial nature of timely action in cases impacting personal liberty. It directed the Delhi High Court to promptly decide on a businessman’s bail plea, emphasizing that delays can deprive individuals of their freedom. The urgency in addressing such cases highlights the significance of swift judicial action in safeguarding personal liberty.