![[UP Muslim Student Slapping Case]"Authorities Not Concerned With The Problem Of Religious Discrimination: Petitioner Tells SC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Muzaffarnagar-Muslim-student-slapping-case_-Authorities-not-acknowledging-problem-of-religious-discrimination_-Petitioner-tells-SC.jpeg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court on Thursday (28th Nov) is reviewing a Public Interest Litigation by Tushar Gandhi concerning the slapping of a Muslim student in Muzaffarnagar and violations of the Right to Education Act. Senior Advocate Shadan Farasat highlighted the lack of enforcement against religious discrimination and addressed inadequacies in the chargesheet regarding child cruelty.
On Monday(18th Nov), the Supreme Court heard a plea seeking the enforcement of measures to curb air pollution in Delhi and surrounding areas. A bench comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Augustine George Masih expressed serious concerns over delays in implementing the Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP).
Justice Oka questioned the Delhi counsel, stating, “Why was the GRAP mechanism not invoked? How can you risk delaying such critical measures?” In response to the counsel’s clarification that stage 4 of GRAP was now in effect, the bench emphasized that the Delhi government must not lower it without court approval, even if the Air Quality Index (AQI) improves below 300. The bench remarked, “We are making it clear that you will not go below stage 4 without our permission.”
The Supreme Court on Thursday(14th Nov), granted former Chhattisgarh bureaucrat Anil Tuteja interim protection from arrest related to the Chhattisgarh liquor scam. This decision came after the Allahabad High Court denied his request to quash criminal proceedings. The court scheduled a hearing for January 21 and also sought responses from the Enforcement Directorate.
Yesterday, On 5th November, The Supreme Court quashed a Gujarat High Court decision that accepted an ‘amicable settlement’ in a rape case without ensuring the illiterate victim understood it. The Court emphasized the need for proper verification and directed the High Court to remand the case, ensuring the victim’s comprehension of legal agreements is confirmed.
Today, On 4th November, the Supreme Court reprimanded the Delhi government and police for ineffective enforcement of the firecracker ban amid deteriorating air quality following Diwali. The court demanded immediate details on implemented measures and future plans, highlighting the need for stringent action to address pollution and ensure public safety during festivals.
![[BREAKING] SC Grants Bail to Ex-TN Minister V. Senthil Balaji in Money Laundering Case](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/image-2024-09-26T102520.872.png?resize=300%2C168&ssl=1)
![[FEMA Case] SC Rejects NDTV's Plea Against Bombay HC Decision](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-52-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 12th August, The Supreme Court dismissed NDTV’s appeal against a Bombay High Court ruling in a FEMA case, involving compounding applications. NDTV sought to quash compounding proceedings under FEMA, but the court upheld the High Court’s decision. The case concerned alleged violations of foreign exchange regulations by NDTV, related to overseas and foreign direct investment.
Supreme Court Justice Surya Kant highlighted the pivotal role of technology in modernizing the judicial system during the National Conference on the Landscape of Technology in Courts in India. He emphasized how technology bridges the gap between rural and urban areas, providing efficient and speedy justice. The event showcased innovative technological practices and emphasized the transformative impact of technology and artificial intelligence on the judiciary.