Delhi High Court quashes FIR arising from a neighbourhood dispute after parties reach an agreement. The court orders the accused to host bhandaras for underprivileged children during the upcoming Navratra festival and Diwali celebrations.
The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Domino’s Pizza, granting an injunction against the use of the “DONITO’s” trademark by a Punjab-based food chain. This decision underscores the importance of protecting established brand identities. The court found that the alleged infringement could mislead and confuse consumers, highlighting the need for legal action to safeguard trademark rights.
![[Trademark Battle] Delhi High Court Grants Relief to Forest Essentials in Case Against Baby Forest](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/shared-image-1.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Delhi High Court’s Division Bench, comprising Justices Vibhu Bakhru and Tara Vitasta Ganju, observed a potential error in the single-judge’s refusal to grant interim relief to Forest Essentials in a trademark dispute against Baby Forest. The Bench issued a notice to Baby Forest and scheduled further hearing on September 9, acknowledging merit in Forest Essentials’ appeal.
![[Moti Mahal vs. Daryaganj] Battle Over 'Butter Chicken' Trademark in Delhi High Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/image-90.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 27th May, Moti Mahal challenged Daryaganj’s trademark on ‘Butter Chicken’ in the Delhi High Court, claiming it as a generic term. The court will address this in July. Moti Mahal also disputes Daryaganj’s tagline, alleging deceptive practices. Legal proceedings are ongoing, with advocates representing both sides. The case is set for a hearing on May 29.
The Delhi High Court prohibited Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL) from comparing its Ponds skincare products with Nivea’s in advertisements following an injunction requested by Nivea’s manufacturer, Beiersdorf AG. The court found the comparison misleading and detrimental to Nivea’s reputation. The case will be heard on July 24, and the interim order reflects the significance of truthful advertising in the skincare industry.
The Delhi High Court granted a temporary injunction against Wow Punjabi, following a trademark infringement claim by Wow! Momo. Justice Anish Dayal acknowledged Wow! Momo’s prima facie case, citing potential irreparable harm and balance of convenience. The decision requires Wow Punjabi to cease usage of the disputed trademark until further legal proceedings.
The Delhi High Court has recently issued a dynamic injunction in favor of Star India, targeting 21 rogue websites accused of illegally streaming copyrighted content from STAR channels and the OTT platform Disney+ Hotstar. Justice Anish Dayal highlighted the clear case presented by the plaintiffs, stating, “Balance of convenience lies in favour of plaintiffs as […]
Justice Anish Dayal of the Delhi High Court expressed concerns about the challenges posed by AI in the legal system, particularly regarding the credibility of evidence. He noted the establishment of the Intellectual Property (IP) division and its success in handling IP cases, reducing backlogs, and receiving recognition from the parliamentary committee.
The Supreme Court of India is currently engaged in a significant legal matter involving a plea by a Delhi judicial officer, specifically an Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ). This plea is in response to remarks made against the judicial officer by Justice Anish Dayal of the Delhi High Court earlier in 2023. The judicial officer’s petition […]