Today, 30th April, The Gujarat High Court declined an urgent hearing for a Public Interest Litigation challenging the uncontested election of a BJP candidate in Surat. Chief Justice Agarwal emphasized adherence to established legal procedures for election grievances, rejecting the use of PILs for election disputes. This case raises important questions about fair electoral processes and democratic perception.
Today(12th March),The Gujarat High Court, led by Chief Justice Sunita Agarwal and Justice Aniruddha Mayee, strongly rejects the lackadaisical “Chalta Hai” mindset of State officials in legal documentation, especially affidavit filings. The court emphasizes the crucial nature of precise and thorough legal filings, refusing to tolerate inadequacies and highlighting the need for adherence to established protocols.
The Gujarat High Court has criticized the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) for its mishandling of land acquisition cases, emphasizing the prolonged neglect and suffering of landowners. The court’s rebuke underscores the importance of responsible governance and the need for transparent and fair land acquisition processes. The NHAI’s lack of accountability and disregard for landowners’ rights were strongly condemned.
In a recent hearing, the Gujarat High Court emphasized the importance of effective advocacy, urging lawyers to argue their cases rather than merely reading out petitions. The division bench, comprising Chief Justice Sunita Agarwal and Justice Aniruddha Mayee, expressed their concerns, stating that simply reading the petition amounts to a “criminal waste of judicial time.” […]
