Delhi High Court Takes Contempt Action Against Lawyer Over ‘Corrupt Judiciary’ Allegations: Reckless, Contemptuous, and Scandalous Claim

The Delhi High Court initiated contempt proceedings against a lawyer for making allegations of a ‘corrupt judiciary.’ The court described the claims as reckless, contemptuous, and scandalous, emphasizing that such statements undermine the integrity of the judicial system.

[Unnao Rape Case] Delhi High Court Extends Ex-BJP Leader Kuldeep Singh Sengar’s Interim Bail Till Jan 20

Delhi High Court today (23rd Dec) has extended expelled BJP MLA Kuldeep Singh Sengar’s interim bail for four weeks, allowing medical consultations at AIIMS following his life sentence for rape and 10-year term for custodial death. Despite opposition from the survivor’s lawyer, health concerns influenced the decision. Next hearing scheduled for January 27, 2025.

[Unnao Rape Case] Delhi High Court Extends Medical Relief for Ex-BJP Kuldeep Singh Senger Till January 15

The Delhi High Court On Friday (20th Dec) extended medical relief for former BJP MLA Kuldeep Singh Senger until January 15, 2025, amid disputes between the victim’s and Senger’s counsels regarding his surveillance. The victim’s mother opposed the decision, emphasizing safety concerns. Senger, convicted for rape, had previously been granted interim bail for personal reasons.

[Unnao Rape Case] Former MLA Kuldeep Singh Senger Moves Delhi HC For Interim Bail Over Delays In Release From Jail

Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri granted interim bail to former MLA Kuldeep Singh Senger until December 20, 2024, due to delays in his release stemming from a conviction for raping a minor in Unnao. His bail is primarily for medical treatment at AIIMS, following previous court hearings addressing his medical needs.

[Breaking] Delhi HC’s Justice Amit Sharma Recuses from Umar Khalid’s Bail Plea in Delhi Riots Case; Will Hear on July 24

Justice Amit Sharma today of the Delhi High Court has recused himself from hearing Umar Khalid’s bail plea in the Delhi riots conspiracy case. The case will be heard again on July 24, along with bail appeals from other co-accused. Umar Khalid, a former JNU scholar, faces multiple charges including criminal conspiracy and unlawful assembly under the UAPA. His continued incarceration has sparked debate and drawn attention from supporters and human rights advocates.

Justice Amit Sharma Recuses from Delhi Riots Bail Cases, matter will be heard by other bench: Delhi HC

Justice Amit Sharma of the Delhi High Court recused himself from hearing bail pleas related to the 2020 Delhi riots. The matter will be heard by a different bench excluding him, as directed by Justice Prathiba M Singh. This marks the fourth bench to handle the cases, including bail pleas filed by Sharjeel Imam, Meeran Haider, and others.

[Demolition Row] Delhi HC asks Authorities to Grant 1 month for Vacating Mosque Premises

The Delhi High Court has granted the caretaker of a mosque and madarsa in Hazrat Nizamuddin one month to vacate the premises before its scheduled demolition. This decision comes after the petitioner’s request for sufficient time to seek legal remedies. The court ordered authorities to allow the caretaker to vacate the site within the specified period.

Delhi High Court Seeks Report on Inadequate Facilities at DU Law Faculty

Today, On 13th June, Delhi High Court demands report on inadequate facilities at DU Law Faculty following a petition by three students. The Court appointed an amicus curiae and directed a meeting between stakeholders to address issues such as air conditioning, drinking water, and WiFi. The next hearing is set for July 4, with advocates representing both the petitioners and Delhi University.

Toothpaste Battle| Delhi High Court Quashes Forgery Complaint by Anchor Against Colgate

The Delhi High Court dismissed forgery allegations brought by Anchor toothpaste against Colgate and its officials. Anchor accused Colgate of forging trademark registration documents, but the court found insufficient evidence to support the claim. The court nullified the complaint and summoning order, clearing Colgate of the allegations. The case underscores the need for concrete evidence in legal actions.