![[BREAKING] "LG is Thinking He is a Court": SC Criticizes Delhi LG for Tree Felling Permission](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/IYGBNL.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court Today (July 12th) said there was a complete non-application of mind by Delhi Lieutenant Governor (LG) VK Saxena in granting permission for felling of trees despite pendency of Delhi Development Authority (DDA)’s application for it before the top court.
The Supreme Court has directed the Central Government on May 16th to deport 17 foreign nationals held in Assam detention camps. Justices Oka and Bhuyan emphasized the absence of pending legal cases against them and urged prompt deportation, prioritizing those held for two years. A two-month deadline was set for the government to submit a compliance report. The next hearing is on July 26.
Today(on 9th May), The Supreme Court has adjourned the challenge to the passport law provision and one-year passport issuance for accused individuals with a court-issued ‘no objection certificate’ until after summer vacations. Lawyer Prashant Bhushan’s plea questions the constitutionality of these measures, arguing that they violate the right to equality. The outcome holds significance for individuals facing criminal charges seeking to travel.
Today, On 6th May, The Supreme Court postponed the hearing for former Tamil Nadu Minister Senthil Balaji’s bail plea to May 15. He seeks bail in a money laundering case and the delay extends the legal proceedings. The anticipation grows around the outcome of his plea. This decision comes after a complex hearing involving the Enforcement Directorate. Balaji’s detention continues as the case progresses.
Today, 30th April, The Supreme Court ruled that the twin tests under the PMLA can affect bail, emphasizing the authority of a criminal court. The debate centers on whether bail conditions still apply after a special court acknowledges the offence and the ED’s authority to arrest post-complaint acknowledgment. Legal discourse stems from a previous refusal of pre-arrest bail in a money laundering case.
The Supreme Court requested responses from the Central government, as well as the states of Punjab and Haryana, regarding a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) aimed at establishing policy guidelines. This PIL seeks to address issues related to policy formulation and implementation within the respective regions. The court’s action underscores a growing focus on governance and regulatory frameworks at a regional level.
![[Nithari Killings Case]| Supreme Court to Hear Plea Against Acquittal](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/image-43-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today,22nd April, Tamil Nadu rejected Survey of India’s findings in the Mullaperiyar Dam Case, leading to a July 10 deadline. The Supreme Court demanded detailed affidavits from both sides. The conflict involves land disputes near the dam and Kerala’s parking project. Justices Oka and Bhuyan will finalize the legal issues by mid-July. Tamil Nadu disputed the survey report’s accuracy, demanding its dismissal.
Today, 12th April,The Supreme Court (SC) ruled that acquittals can’t be reversed based solely on alternative interpretations, emphasizing the importance of legal standards in reviewing acquittals. Justices Oka and Bhuyan’s bench stated that unless an appellate court deems an acquittal judgment as perverse, it cannot intervene. The court’s decision reinforces the presumption of innocence and highlights burden of proof principles, ultimately acquitting the appellants in a murder case.
The Supreme Court expressed concern over delays in issuing decrees by the registry, impacting matrimonial cases. Staff attributed the delay to misplaced settlement terms, but the Court found this unacceptable, emphasizing the duty of the registry to execute orders promptly. The Court stressed that the delay hindered justice for litigants, urging swift action.