The Lokpal has dismissed a corruption complaint against former Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud, citing lack of jurisdiction. The anti-corruption Inspector clarified that sitting judges and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court do not fall within its purview under Section 14 of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act. This provision restricts the Lokpal’s authority to probe complaints against such high-ranking judicial officials.
The Supreme Court on Friday (20th Dec) addressed a plea alleging illegal construction near Uttarakhand’s Rajaji National Park, questioning its legitimacy. If violations are found, demolition may occur; otherwise, a penalty may be imposed. The court noted concerns about road construction breaching wildlife protection laws, emphasizing the need for compliance and accountability in environmental matters.
A Delhi Court has dismissed a plea for an FIR against Congress Chief Mallikarjun Kharge over alleged hate speech at an April 2023 rally, citing the complainant’s existing evidence and identity of the accused. However, the court allowed for pre-summoning evidence and noted future investigation could be pursued if required.
On September 23, Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud began construction on a new Bombay High Court complex, while the Supreme Court directed Maharashtra’s chief secretary to arrange a meeting about redeveloping an annexe building. Urgent repairs are needed, and plans for temporary relocation of court facilities are in motion, reflecting the court’s historical importance.
A plea filed by the Shahi Idgah Management Committee was dismissed by the Delhi High Court, which criticized the appeal as politically motivated and a potential source of communal tension. The court indicated that the installation of a statue of Rani Lakshmi Bai would proceed as planned by the MCD, emphasizing women’s empowerment.
The Supreme Court Today (Sept 9) dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) petition challenging the continued supply of arms by Indian companies to Israel amidst its conflict with Palestine. A Bench Led by CJI questioned the Court’s jurisdiction to intervene in foreign policy matters, highlighting that such decisions traditionally fall within the domain of the government.
A bench consisting of Justices BV Nagarathna and N Kotiswar Singh was hearing the Congress’ appeal against the Delhi High Court’s March 13 order, which found no reason to interfere with the ITAT’s decision. However, the High Court permitted the Congress to file a new stay application before the ITAT, taking into account developments such […]
The Delhi High Court advised the petitioner to withdraw the election challenge against Chirag Paswan’s Lok Sabha win and approach the jurisdictional high court in Bihar. The court expressed doubts about the case’s maintainability in Delhi, given that the constituency is in Bihar. It scheduled a hearing for August 28. The petitioner alleged sexual assault and challenged Paswan’s nomination.
The Delhi High Court has re-designated Magisterial Courts in the National Capital Territory under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, effective from July 1, 2024. The re-designation reclassifies the courts and ensures continuity with the previous court structure, transferring all judicial powers and functions previously vested in Chief Metropolitan Magistrates to the newly re-designated courts.
![[Swiggy vs. CCI] Karnataka HC Uncertain on Swiggy's Plea Against CCI Order](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-122.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Karnataka High Court on 23rd May, expressed uncertainty about its jurisdiction over Swiggy’s plea against a Competition Commission of India (CCI) directive. The court questioned if any part of the case’s cause of action took place in Karnataka, requesting additional clarity from Swiggy. The dispute centers on sharing confidential information with the CCI during an anti-competitive practice probe.