Student Suicides| ‘Why Are They Dying Only in Kota?’: Supreme Court Slams Rajasthan Govt

Today, On 23rd May, The Supreme Court strongly criticised the Rajasthan government over the rising number of student suicides in Kota. It questioned why such tragedies were happening only in Kota and urged the state to seriously address the issue.

Senior Advocate Designations | “Deferred & Rejected Applications Shall Be Processed Expeditiously”: SC Directs Delhi HC

Today, On 15th April, The Supreme Court has told the Delhi High Court to review its earlier decisions on lawyers whose applications for Senior Advocate designation were rejected or kept pending. It also asked the court to form a new Permanent Committee to handle the selection process.

Judging Requires Empathy and Wisdom, Not Just Mechanics: Delhi HC Justice C D Singh

Justice Chandra Dhari Singh, during his farewell, emphasized that judging goes beyond mere law application; it requires empathy and understanding of those affected. He highlighted the balance of wisdom and compassion, urging legal professionals to restore faith in the judiciary amid rising public skepticism. The legal system must exemplify humanity, not bureaucracy.

Supreme Court Cancels Bail of In-Laws in Dowry Death Case, Calls It a ‘Grave Social Concern’

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court of India on Monday expressed deep concern over the continuing problem of dowry deaths, calling it a “grave social concern.” The court stressed that judges must carefully examine all details before granting bail in such cases, as the crime directly affects social justice and equality.

Supreme Court: UP Govt. to End Colonial-Era Practice of Bureaucrats’ Wives Holding Key Posts in Societies

New Delhi, Feb 17: The Uttar Pradesh government has informed the Supreme Court that it is making changes to state laws to remove the practice of appointing the wives and family members of bureaucrats as ex-officio members in cooperative societies and trusts. The government is also working on model rules to regulate these entities, especially those receiving financial aid from the state.

Supreme Court Rules Section 175(3) BNSS Requires Magistrate to Review Police Submissions Before Ordering Investigation, Unlike Section 156(3) CrPC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court of India has pointed out the key differences between Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) and Section 175(3) of the recently enacted Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), particularly in the process of filing an FIR (First Information Report).

UAPA Challenges || “High Courts Are Competent to Adjudicate These Issues Initially”: CJI Sanjiv Khanna Declines Direct Hearing

Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna stated that high courts are capable of handling UAPA challenges initially. He emphasized that the Supreme Court should not be the first forum for such cases. The bench advised petitioners to approach the respective high courts before seeking intervention from the apex court. This decision reinforces the legal process and judicial hierarchy in handling UAPA cases.

Section 498A and Dowry Act Misuse: Supreme Court Warns Wife For Filling False FIR

The Supreme Court of India ruled against a woman’s misuse of legal protections intended for domestic violence victims, quashing her FIR under Section 498A, which lacked specific evidence. The judgment highlighted the need for courts to scrutinize such cases, aiming to protect innocent family members and prevent retaliatory legal actions during divorce proceedings.

‘Socialist’ And ‘Secular’ In Preamble: CJI Reserves Order, Denies Larger Bench Review| Scheduled For Final Verdict On 25th Nov

The Supreme Court reserved its verdict on petitions challenging the inclusion of “socialist” and “secular” in the Indian Constitution’s Preamble, scheduled for November 25. CJI Sanjiv Khanna emphasized secularism as a core constitutional aspect and noted prior judicial review of the 42nd Amendment, rejecting claims of its unconstitutionality during the Emergency.

Judicial Scrutiny of Collegium Decisions|| “Scrutiny is Permissible Within The Limited Scope of Judicial Review”: Supreme Court

Today, On 6th September, the Supreme Court ruled that limited judicial scrutiny of Collegium decisions is permitted to ensure proper consultation among members. The decision allows review of consultation process but not the suitability of candidates. The Court emphasized collective decision-making in judicial appointments and directed a reconsideration of two District Judges’ candidacies for elevation.