In a strong observation, the Supreme Court asked, “Why should a corrupt public official be allowed to resume the job?” while questioning reinstatement after conviction, raising serious concerns about integrity in public service roles.
![[BREAKING] Supreme Court Rejects Plea Seeking FIR Against Justice Yashwant Varma](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Justice-Yashwant-Varma-Denies-Cash-Stash-Seen-In-Video_-_Conspiracy-To-Frame-Me_-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
NEW DELHI: Today, 28th March, The Supreme Court has dismissed a plea seeking the registration of an FIR against Justice Yashwant Varma. A bench comprising Justice Abhay S Oka and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan heard the case. The petition, filed by Advocate Mathews Nedumpara, argues that instead of transferring Justice Varma, a criminal case should be registered against him.
On December 12, 2024, LawChakra hosted a live discussion with journalist Saurav Das, covering issues in India’s judicial system, including the Uniform Civil Code, marital rape criminalization, and corruption. Das emphasized the need for systemic reforms, judicial independence, and the importance of judges adhering to constitutional ideals while addressing media influence and accountability.
The Bombay High Court has dismissed petitions aimed at blocking the film “Match Fixing,” which is inspired by the 2008 Malegaon blast case. The court ruled that the movie could proceed with its release, stating it is a work of fiction and questioning the validity of concerns regarding its impact on ongoing legal proceedings.
Today, On 12th November, the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna, discontinued oral mentions for urgent hearings, requiring requests to be submitted via email or written slips. This change aims to streamline processes and enhance efficiency, though critics argue it may hinder immediate access for genuinely urgent cases needing swift judicial response.
Former SCBA president Adish Aggarwala wrote to PM Modi, praising new criminal laws but stressing the need for increased judicial personnel, police, and forensic experts. He criticized the past regime for implementing laws without necessary support and pointed out challenges in the current system. Aggarwala urged PM Modi to ensure proper implementation with adequate infrastructure.
The Delhi High Court convicted Pradeep Aggarwal for criminal contempt of court due to attempting to extort money via a petition against alleged illegal construction. The court imposed a Rs.1 lakh fine and ordered his presence throughout the day. The bench, while emphasizing the severity of his conduct, considered Aggarwal’s remorse in delivering the punishment.
Today, 2nd July, Lawyers in New Delhi oppose a directive to postpone final orders during judicial vacations, sparking controversy. The advisory allegedly prohibits vacation judges from issuing final orders, leading to concerns over delays and a potential impact on judicial independence. This move has prompted objections from legal circles and highlighted the balance between administrative efficiency and timely justice.