The Supreme Court ruled that witness testimony from relatives cannot be dismissed solely based on familial connections. It emphasized a careful evaluation of such testimonies. The appellant’s conviction was reduced due to evidence showing no premeditation in a heated altercation, leading to his release after serving nearly ten years in prison.
Today, On 12th July, The Supreme Court granted relief to Chandigarh shooter Manraj Singh Chatha, allowing him to pursue a law degree. Justices advised him not to use a rifle in law practice. The Court upheld the high court’s decision, noting that it would not set a precedent. The case underscores the balance needed in maintaining dual careers and ethical standards.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court upheld the appointment of seven judges, dismissing a petition against the appointments. The court found no merit in the arguments presented, reinforcing the validity and lawfulness of the judicial appointments. The Division Bench rejected the challenge based on various grounds, including lack of advertisement and representation, stating that the appointment process adhered to constitutional procedures.
The Supreme Court reinforced the credibility of dying declarations, emphasizing their weight in legal proceedings. The judgment upheld a life sentence for a man convicted of brutally murdering his wife in Maharashtra. The victim’s declarations, made while facing imminent death, played a vital role in delivering justice. The ruling sheds light on domestic violence issues and the judiciary’s role in addressing such crimes.
