The Delhi High Court warned the Delhi Jal Board of contempt for not following its orders on sewage treatment plants (STPs). The court said that even after clear instructions to install flow meters at discharge points in all 37 STPs, the board did not take it seriously. Dirty water is still being released into the Yamuna, breaking court rules. Calling the situation “completely not acceptable,” the court showed strong disapproval.
Between 2019 and October 2024, the Enforcement Directorate filed 911 chargesheets under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, achieving only 42 convictions, indicating a low conviction rate of approximately 4.6%. With 28% of cases still pending trial, concerns of political bias and misuse of the Act have been raised.
Today, On 10th December, the Centre informed the Supreme Court about directives issued to state chief secretaries to comply with the Anuradha Bhasin case ruling on internet shutdowns. The petition highlighted concerns over shutdowns during exams disrupting economic activities, urging exploration of alternative anti-cheating methods. The Supreme Court is currently addressing these issues.
![[Badlapur Sexual Assault Case] "How Can the State Take Custodial Death So Lightly?": HC Slams CID for Negligent Probe into Killing of Accused](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-4-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 2nd December, The Bombay High Court criticized the CID for its negligent investigation into the murder of Akshay Shinde, an accused in a sexual assault case. The court expressed concerns about the lack of seriousness, emphasizing the need for thorough investigations to ensure justice. A hearing is scheduled for January 20, 2025, for further review.
![[Bulldozer Justice] "Officials To Pay From Salary": SC Lays Down Pan India Guidelines On Demolition Of Properties](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-2024-08-31T101346.318.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court of India today (13th Nov) ruled that demolishing properties of accused individuals is unlawful. In issuing guidelines, the Court emphasized the rule of law, separation of powers, and accountability. No demolition should occur without a proper notice and opportunity for appeal. Officials failing to follow these directives may face personal financial consequences.
![[Bizarre Request]“My Mind is Being Controlled by A Machine,” Claims By The Petitioner: SC Rejects Plea](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/image-1-1.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Punjab and Haryana High Court criticized an Additional Sessions Judge for prioritizing a police statement over a court testimony, leading to unjust penalties against witnesses. The Bench expressed its concern for judicial diligence and recommended further training for the judge, referring the case to the Chief Justice for appropriate administrative action.
Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud noted that a Supreme Court report on prisoner issues was inspired by President Murmu’s speech on inmates’ challenges. He emphasized the importance of judicial reforms for prisoners’ rights, revealed new publications marking the Supreme Court’s 75th anniversary, and addressed issues like menstrual equity and caste discrimination in prisons.
![[Bahraich Violence] "Is State Misunderstood Intent of Previous Order on Demolition Notices?": Allahabad HC Slams UP Govt. For not Filing Response](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-2-6.png?resize=447%2C251&ssl=1)
Today, On 23rd October, the Allahabad High Court criticized the Uttar Pradesh government for not responding to a case regarding demolitions in Bahraich. The court expressed frustration over delays and instructed the state to provide detailed information about the road’s category. Affected residents were given 15 days to respond to demolition notices.
The Supreme Court has directed the Central Government on May 16th to deport 17 foreign nationals held in Assam detention camps. Justices Oka and Bhuyan emphasized the absence of pending legal cases against them and urged prompt deportation, prioritizing those held for two years. A two-month deadline was set for the government to submit a compliance report. The next hearing is on July 26.
The Supreme Court of India highlighted the need for active participation of courts in trials, especially when public prosecutors neglect their duties. The court stressed the importance of thorough cross-examinations by public prosecutors to uncover the truth. Emphasizing the duty of courts to ascertain truth, it criticized prosecutorial and judicial failures.