The Bombay High Court ruled that keeping a mother’s four-year-old daughter away from her is “cruelty” under IPC Section 498-A. Despite a lower court’s custody order, the child is withheld, causing mental harassment. The court upheld an FIR against the mother’s in-laws, emphasizing ongoing mental injury and contempt of judicial orders.
![[Bahraich Violence] "Is State Misunderstood Intent of Previous Order on Demolition Notices?": Allahabad HC Slams UP Govt. For not Filing Response](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-2-6.png?resize=447%2C251&ssl=1)
Today, On 23rd October, the Allahabad High Court criticized the Uttar Pradesh government for not responding to a case regarding demolitions in Bahraich. The court expressed frustration over delays and instructed the state to provide detailed information about the road’s category. Affected residents were given 15 days to respond to demolition notices.
On Monday(8th April), The Karnataka High Court expressed concern over state authorities’ casual attitude towards complying with court orders, stressing that delayed compliance is akin to contempt of court. It issued notices to various government and semi-government bodies and raised questions about compliance procedures. The matter is scheduled for further hearing on June 5.
Gujarat High Court Chief Justice Sunita Agarwal opposes the transfer of part-heard cases between benches, emphasizing that once a case is assigned to a specific bench, the Chief Justice cannot reallocate it. She intends to address this issue with the Full Court to find a permanent solution, aiming to maintain consistency and follow established rules.