Today, On 20th February, The Supreme Court told Maharashtra that while its officers may face pressure, the judiciary remains independent and unaffected. The remark came during a hearing, emphasizing that courts function without external influence. The bench reaffirmed the judiciary’s role in upholding justice impartially. Maharashtra was reminded that judicial integrity cannot be compromised.
Yesterday, On 5th November, The Supreme Court quashed a Gujarat High Court decision that accepted an ‘amicable settlement’ in a rape case without ensuring the illiterate victim understood it. The Court emphasized the need for proper verification and directed the High Court to remand the case, ensuring the victim’s comprehension of legal agreements is confirmed.
On Monday(16th Sept),The Gauhati High Court has addressed the custodial death of Tafazzul Islam, a 24-year-old gang rape suspect, by issuing notices to government officials. This action follows a petition from Abdul Awal, the deceased’s father, demanding a comprehensive investigation and compensation.
The Karnataka High Court extended the interim order preventing trial court proceedings against Chief Minister Siddaramaiah. The court adjourned the hearing of Siddaramaiah’s petition challenging the Governor’s order to September 2. Arguments and counterarguments were presented to address the prosecution sanction, with concerns raised about alleged fraud and improper land transfers.
The Telangana High Court summoned the state’s Home Department to address a writ petition alleging police misconduct, despite previous court orders. The plea, filed by G. Swetha and G. Rakesh, accused local police officials of unlawfully detaining Rakesh, in violation of a conditional bail order. Additionally, the court upheld the death sentence of Dinesh Kumar Dharne for the rape and murder of a minor girl in 2017.
The Karnataka High Court fined The New Indian Express Rs.10 lakh for irresponsible reporting on a sensitive judicial matter, leading to charges being dropped against a judge. Justice NS Sanjay Gowda criticized the publication for disclosing sensitive information without giving the implicated parties a chance to respond. The court emphasized the need for responsible journalism and called for an internal inquiry into the leaked report.
