In a recent interview, Senior Advocate Dr. Abhishek Singhvi, a distinguished politician and constitutional expert, shared his insights on various pressing issues related to personal liberty, the judicial system, and recent legislative changes in India. This analysis delves into the key points discussed, providing a comprehensive understanding of the topics covered.
Ex-SC Judge Justice Madan B Lokur has expressed concern over the social media backlash faced by courts, following trolling aimed at a Delhi judge who granted bail to CM Arvind Kejriwal. He emphasized the potential for such online harassment to influence judicial decisions, highlighting broader challenges in maintaining judicial independence amidst digital scrutiny. [‘Judges Being Judged’]
Chief Justice DY Chandrachud underscored the significance of elections in democracy while highlighting the unique non-elective status of Indian judges. He emphasized the judiciary’s responsibility to uphold constitutional values and maintain continuity, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach to technology adoption within the legal framework.
The Delhi High Court imposed a fine of Rs. 25,000 on an individual seeking justifications for Supreme Court Collegium’s recommendations, emphasizing the Collegium’s autonomy. The petitioner’s plea was deemed a misuse of judicial resources, lacking genuine public interest. The decision raised concerns about judicial independence versus transparency in the Collegium system.
The recent discussion on the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) in Delhi raised concerns about its potential misuse if the current Government returns to power. Senior advocates emphasized the perilous state of civil liberties in India and highlighted arbitrary detentions under UAPA. There is an urgent need for judicial independence and adherence to constitutional rights.
The Delhi High Court cautioned against frequent case transfers, warning of potential long-term harm to judges’ careers and questioning the fairness and integrity of the judiciary. Emphasizing the need for solid evidence to justify transfers, the court rejected a transfer petition and imposed a fine, underscoring the commitment to judicial fairness and integrity.
Former Supreme Court Justice Rohinton Nariman proposed a reform for India’s Collegium system, suggesting a panel with the Chief Justice and four retired judges to enhance judicial independence and address system flaws. He also emphasized the importance of transparency in the selection process and the inclusion of practicing members of the legal profession in the nomination process. The proposed framework aims to ensure well-qualified and committed judges while fostering judicial independence and accountability.
On Monday (22nd April): The Allahabad High Court expressed concerns over district judges’ fear of administrative complaints and subsequent transfers, hindering their ability to exercise jurisdiction freely. The court lamented the lack of confidence in civil courts due to factors like frequent strikes and delayed resolutions, making them less appealing for swift relief. The case involved a dispute over land possession.
The manifestos of the Congress and CPI(M) parties aim to make changes to India’s legal landscape. Both parties have proposed repealing controversial laws such as the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). Additionally, they advocate for bifurcating the Supreme Court, likely to address issues related to the workload and efficiency of the judiciary.
Chief Justice of India Emphasizes Judicial Independence and Women Representation in Bengaluru Conference. At the 21st biennial state-level conference of judicial officers in Karnataka, Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud, delivered an inspiring message to the judiciary, urging officers to rule on bail petitions with integrity, devoid of external pressures. BENGALURU: On Saturday during the […]