Justice Sanjiv Khanna is set to become the 51st Chief Justice of India, emphasizing personal liberty and effective judicial processes. He has a noteworthy ability to cross-examine from memory and began his legal journey at Tis Hazari Court. His controversial elevation to the Supreme Court in 2019 highlights his commitment to a robust legal career.
In April 1976, Justice H.R. Khanna dissented in the ADM Jabalpur case, arguing personal liberty cannot be suspended during emergencies. His principled stand against the Indira Gandhi government led to his bypassing for Chief Justice, marking a pivotal moment for judicial independence. His legacy continues through his nephew, Justice Sanjiv Khanna.
![[Kapil Sibal Lecture] "Collegium System was intended to protect judicial independence, but has become centralized & arbitrary": SCBA President](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-127.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, who currently presides over the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA), Today (Oct 26) delivered a captivating lecture at the Sikkim Judicial Academy. Renowned for his legal acumen and extensive experience, Sibal addressed fundamental issues concerning judicial independence, constitutional principles, and systemic reforms. From his opening statement to the conclusion, Sibal’s address was both a critical analysis and a clarion call for meaningful reforms within the Indian judiciary.
Yesterday, On 25th October, the Supreme Court criticized the Patna High Court for issuing post-dated bail orders that would take effect only after five months. The Supreme Court emphasized the need for timely justice and remanded the cases for reconsideration. This ruling reflects a broader push for transparency in legal proceedings.
Justice Sanjiv Khanna is set to become the 51st Chief Justice of India on November 11, succeeding CJI D.Y. Chandrachud. Known for pivotal rulings on Article 370 and electoral bonds, Khanna’s appointment marks a significant transition in the Supreme Court’s leadership, reinforcing accountability and transparency in India’s judicial system.
Today, On 24th October, the Supreme Court criticized a petition requesting an investigation into Karnataka High Court Judge M. Nagaprasanna’s recusal, allowing its withdrawal. The Court deemed the petition inappropriate, expressing concerns about potential misinterpretations of judicial conduct and emphasizing the importance of respecting judicial discretion without implying ulterior motives against judges.
Today, On 19th October, Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud highlighted the Supreme Court’s role as a people’s court, emphasizing judicial independence and the need to balance with legislative and executive branches. He cautioned against evaluating the court based on outcomes, advocating for access to justice and advancing technology to enhance transparency in judicial processes.
Today, On 23rd September, Chief Justice DY Chandrachud reaffirmed the Indian judiciary’s independence, emphasizing that judges operate autonomously in judicial matters but collaborate with the government on budgeting and infrastructure. He aimed to clarify that this cooperation does not undermine judicial independence, as it is essential for modernizing court facilities for public benefit.
The Centre has informed the Supreme Court of delays in implementing the SC Collegium’s recommendations for high court chief justice appointments due to “sensitive material” held by the government. Attorney General R. Venkatramani proposed submitting these inputs in a sealed cover for the judges’ review to maintain confidentiality. The matter will be heard again on September 20.