The Supreme Court collegium started meeting lawyers being considered for High Court judgeship for the first time. To reduce nepotism, they are avoiding recommending candidates who have close relatives in the judiciary and are giving more chances to first-generation lawyers. These meetings help assess candidates’ suitability better. This step aims to make judicial appointments fairer and more transparent.
The Supreme Court ruled that witness testimony from relatives cannot be dismissed solely based on familial connections. It emphasized a careful evaluation of such testimonies. The appellant’s conviction was reduced due to evidence showing no premeditation in a heated altercation, leading to his release after serving nearly ten years in prison.
![[Bulldozer Justice] "Wrongful Demolitions Warrant Compensation; Officials Should Not Be Shielded from Accountability": Supreme Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Watch-What-is-Bulldozer-Justice-And-Why-Does-the-SC-Want-Guidelines-Against-It_-on-News9-Plus.png?resize=447%2C348&ssl=1)
Today, On 13th November, the Supreme Court condemned “bulldozer justice,” stating that legal actions should not imply guilt before a fair trial. It ruled demolishing properties of accused individuals is unlawful, emphasizing due process, accountability, and the protection of family homes from arbitrary state action, regardless of accusations or convictions.
