Yesterday, On 19th November, The Supreme Court will hear a plea about pre-censorship of films in January, initiated by actor-director Amol Palekar. The case challenges the Cinematograph Act’s regulations, arguing they are outdated. During previous hearings, concerns regarding government regulations and artistic freedom were raised, with the landscape of film censorship in India evolving continually.
Former Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud highlighted the complexities of judicial appointments in India, emphasizing the collaboration between the judiciary and government. He addressed concerns over delays, stressing the importance of a robust dialogue and acknowledging the role of multiple stakeholders. Chandrachud maintained that this multi-layered process ensures fairness and upholds judicial independence.
![[2020 Northeast Delhi Riots] Lawyers, Student & others Appeal to SC, Delhi HC for Expeditious Bail Hearing Within Two-weeks](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-72-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The National Alliance for Justice, Accountability, and Rights (NAJAR) urged the Supreme Court and Delhi High Court to expedite bail hearings for the “equal citizenship” cases (FIR 59/2020) related to the 2020 Northeast Delhi riots. They requested all bail applications to be resolved within two weeks, criticizing the delays and advocating for appropriate compensation for the accused and their families.
On Tuesday(6th August),The Supreme Court of India has directed the Gujarat High Court to provide a detailed report on the pendency and management of civil suits. This order, issued by a Bench of Justice Surya Kant and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, aims to address key issues affecting civil court proceedings in the state.
