• Sat. Dec 20th, 2025
    • '

    Tag: judicial decision

    Defamation Case: Court Grants Relief to Rahul Gandhi, Hearing Postponed to December 23
    Defamation Case: Court Grants Relief to Rahul Gandhi, Hearing Postponed to December 23
    Other CourtsHeadlines

    Fighting Indian State Remark: Big Relief for Rahul Gandhi as Court Dismisses Petition

    In a major relief for Rahul Gandhi, a court in Chandausi, Uttar Pradesh, dismissed a petition filed against him over his alleged remark that the Congress was “fighting the Indian State,” bringing an end to the long legal battle. In a significant relief for former Congress president and Leader of the Opposition in the Lok […]

    author
    Ordinary Marital Quarrels Can’t Be Treated as Abetment of Suicide Under Section 306 IPC: Allahabad High Court
    Ordinary Marital Quarrels Can’t Be Treated as Abetment of Suicide Under Section 306 IPC: Allahabad High Court
    High CourtHeadlines

    S.125 CrPC | Wife Can Claim Maintenance from Minor Husband, But Liability Starts After He Attains the Age of Majority: Allahabad High Court

    The Allahabad High Court has clarified that a wife can file for maintenance under Section 125 CrPC against her minor husband. However, the legal liability to pay arises only after the husband attains the age of majority.

    author
    BREAKING| Supreme Court Allows 2022 MP Civil Judge Recruitment: 3-Year Practice or 70% LL.B Marks in One Attempt Rule Not Applicable
    BREAKING| Supreme Court Allows 2022 MP Civil Judge Recruitment: 3-Year Practice or 70% LL.B Marks in One Attempt Rule Not Applicable
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    BREAKING| Supreme Court Allows 2022 MP Civil Judge Recruitment: 3-Year Practice or 70% LL.B Marks in One Attempt Rule Not Applicable

    Today, On 23rd September, The Supreme Court has allowed the 2022 Madhya Pradesh Civil Judge selection to proceed, ruling that the conditions of three years’ legal practice or 70% LL.B marks in a single attempt will not apply.

    author
    Unhygienic Washrooms Violate Fundamental Rights of Court Users: Supreme Court
    Unhygienic Washrooms Violate Fundamental Rights of Court Users: Supreme Court
    Supreme Court

    “Judicial Decision Does Not Offend Any Fundamental Right”: Supreme Court Dismissed Misconceived Writ

    The Supreme Court clarifies that a judicial decision does not offend any Fundamental Right, dismissing a misconceived writ petition and reaffirming the finality of judicial rulings in India.

    author
    'Will Move Supreme Court': Kapil Sibal Slams Delhi High Court Over Umar Khalid’s Bail Denial, Terms It 'Injustice'
    'Will Move Supreme Court': Kapil Sibal Slams Delhi High Court Over Umar Khalid’s Bail Denial, Terms It 'Injustice'
    High CourtHeadlines

    BREAKING| Delhi Riots Conspiracy Case: High Court Denies Bail to Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam and 7 Others

    Today, On 2nd September, The Delhi High Court has refused to grant bail to Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam and seven others accused in the larger conspiracy case under UAPA related to the 2020 north-east Delhi riots, citing serious allegations against them.

    author
    Supreme Court Rejects Presidential Reference, Finds Arunachal Public Service Commission Member Not Guilty of ‘Misbehaviour’ Charge
    Supreme Court Rejects Presidential Reference, Finds Arunachal Public Service Commission Member Not Guilty of ‘Misbehaviour’ Charge
    Supreme Court

    Supreme Court Rejects Presidential Reference, Finds Arunachal Public Service Commission Member Not Guilty of ‘Misbehaviour’ Charge

    Supreme Court rejects Presidential Reference under Article 317(1) of the Constitution and finds the Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission member not guilty of ‘misbehaviour’, stating, “Actions don’t even meet the threshold of misbehaviour,” ensuring immediate reinstatement.

    author
    Supreme Court Dismisses POCSO Case: “Promise of Marriage & Consensual Relationship Do Not Constitute Rape”
    Supreme Court Dismisses POCSO Case: “Promise of Marriage & Consensual Relationship Do Not Constitute Rape”
    Supreme Court

    Supreme Court Dismisses POCSO Case: “Promise of Marriage & Consensual Relationship Do Not Constitute Rape”

    The Supreme Court dismissed that a promise of marriage followed by a consensual relationship does not amount to rape, as it dismissed a POCSO case filed against a man who later withdrew his marriage proposal.

    author
    Bombay HC Denies Relief to Ex-MLA for Illegally Naming Chowk ‘Tipu Sultan’
    Bombay HC Denies Relief to Ex-MLA for Illegally Naming Chowk ‘Tipu Sultan’
    High CourtLatest newsLegal updates

    Bombay HC Denies Relief to Ex-MLA for Illegally Naming Chowk ‘Tipu Sultan’

    The Bombay High Court denied ex-AIMIM MLA Farukh Shah’s request to quash an FIR concerning illegal construction and naming of a public square. The court ruled his actions violated legal protocols and misused public funds. Shah faces multiple criminal charges, while the investigation regarding fund misappropriation continues.

    author
    “Don’t Go, Give Lecture Online”: Bombay High Court Tells Anand Teltumbde While Refusing Foreign Travel Plea in Elgaar Parishad Case
    “Don’t Go, Give Lecture Online”: Bombay High Court Tells Anand Teltumbde While Refusing Foreign Travel Plea in Elgaar Parishad Case
    High CourtHeadlinesLegal updates

    Can’t Force Rape Survivor to Carry Unwanted Pregnancy, Rules Bombay High Court

    Bombay High Court allows 12-year-old rape survivor to abort 28-week pregnancy despite medical risks. Court says forcing her to continue would strip her of the right to choose her life’s path.

    author
    Senior Advocate Indira Jaising Opposes Interviews for Senior Designation in Supreme Court
    Supreme Court

    Senior Advocate Indira Jaising Opposes Interviews for Senior Designation in Supreme Court

    NEW DELHI: Senior Advocate Indira Jaising told the Supreme Court on Thursday that she does not support the idea of conducting interviews to designate lawyers as Senior Advocates. She clarified that she never made such a suggestion in 2017, yet the Supreme Court included an interview process in its judgment and assigned 25 marks for it.

    author