CJI B R Gavai said that giving justice is not a 10 to 5 job but a sacred responsibility. He spoke emotionally about his journey, his parents’ values, and his strong connection with Aurangabad.
Madras High Court criticizes the National Highways Department for a 34-month delay in processing a widow’s compassionate job application. The court says corruption is widespread in every part of the government.
The Supreme Court is deliberating on the appointment of 25,753 teachers and non-teaching staff in West Bengal, following the Calcutta High Court’s invalidation of these appointments due to alleged corruption in the 2016 recruitment process. Concerns over the integrity of the selection process persist as the CBI continues its investigation into the malpractice. Hearings are set to resume on February 10.
Employees may be fired from their jobs for various reasons, including unsatisfactory work performance or actions and attitudes that disrupt the workplace environment. In many countries, including India, the rules governing termination often depend on the circumstances leading to dismissal. For instance, if an employee is terminated due to misconduct, the employer is not legally obligated to provide prior notice. Misconduct may include serious violations such as dishonesty, harassment, theft, or other behaviors that breach the company’s code of conduct or ethical standards.
The Calcutta High Court Today (Aug 28) directed the West Bengal School Service Commission (SSC) to complete the appointment process for 14,052 candidates as assistant teachers in state government-sponsored and -aided upper primary schools within 12 weeks.
CJI Led Bench said that individuals from marginalised sections, first-generation lawyers and law graduates without a degree from a National Law University (NLU) face greater challenges in gaining acceptance in senior lawyers’ chambers and law firms.
The Karnataka High Court emphasized the importance of job security, stating that termination of a job in public employment deprives an employee of their means of livelihood. The ruling dismissed an appeal and stressed the necessity of a fair hearing before dismissal, setting a precedent in safeguarding the rights of public service employees.
