Ex-Judges and senior lawyers have issued an open letter to the Chief Justice of India, expressing deep concern over the Supreme Court’s remarks on Rohingya refugees. They warn the comments could “undermine constitutional values and human dignity”.
The Supreme Court began hearing petitions on Rohingya deportation and refugee rights in Jaffar Ullah v. UOI, focusing on refugee status, bail, basic amenities, and legal deportation, with matters divided into three separate groups.
The action of the USA and Israel against Iran raise serious concerns under International Law regarding sovereignty and use of force. while often justified as self defense, they have increased regional instability.
Today, On 16th May, The Supreme Court asked for concrete proof regarding claims that Rohingya refugees were thrown into the sea, stressing that petitions cannot be based on social media content alone. “You cannot keep collecting info from social media.”
Harish Salve, in an interview, critiques the Supreme Court’s perceived role as India’s “moral guardian,” arguing it should focus on constitutional duties and resist judicial overreach. He highlights that executive inaction often shifts responsibilities to the court, creating unrealistic expectations that can lead to public disappointment in judicial decisions.
This event not only signifies the strengthening relationship between the International Court of Justice and the Supreme Court of India but also serves as a platform for exchanging ideas and fostering dialogue on the universal principles of justice, independence, and innovation in the judiciary. Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, in his welcoming remarks, expressed his delight […]
The International Court of Justice has issued provisional measures against Israel, aimed at preventing genocide against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. This ruling, supported by Justice Dalveer Bhandari, an esteemed Indian judge, highlights the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and mandates Israel to take steps to protect civilians and prevent acts that could lead to genocide.
The UN’s top court holds hearings on alleged Gaza genocide. South Africa accuses Israel of genocide, demands emergency suspension of military campaign in Gaza. Landmark legal confrontation between two nations with deep historical ties. Case garners international attention, sparking global debate on human rights and international law. Verdict’s implications reach far beyond the two nations involved.
