7/11 Mumbai Blasts| “Some of the Accused Are Pakistani Nationals”: Supreme Court Raises Concern Over Absconding Convicts

Today, On, 24th July, The Supreme Court expressed serious concern after learning that some accused are Pakistani nationals and still absconding, as it reviewed the status of missing convicts in the 2006 serial train blast case.

BREAKING | 7/11 Mumbai Blasts | “But They Are Not Going Back To Jail”: Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC’s Acquittal Judgment

Today, On, 24th July, The Supreme Court stayed the Bombay High Court acquittal order in the 7/11 Mumbai blasts case, saying, “No question of bringing the accused back to prison,” but clarified the judgment will not be treated as a precedent.

7/11 Mumbai Train Blasts | Supreme Court to Hear Maharashtra Govt’s Challenge to Bombay HC Acquittal Verdict on July 24

Today, On 22nd July, The Supreme Court decided that it will hear on July 24 the Maharashtra government’s plea challenging the Bombay High Court’s verdict that acquitted all 12 accused in the 7/11 Mumbai train blasts case after 19 years of legal battle.

7/11 Mumbai Train Blasts | “Verdict Is Very Shocking, Will Challenge It in Supreme Court”: Maharashtra Government

Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis called the Bombay High Court’s verdict in the 7/11 Mumbai train blasts case “very shocking” and said the state government will soon challenge the acquittal of 12 accused in the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court Acquits Death Row Convict in 2015 TCS Employee Rape and Murder Case

NEW DELHI: Today (28th Jan): The Supreme Court of India has acquitted Chandrabhan Sudam Sanap, a man who was on death row since 2015 for the rape and murder of a 23-year-old techie, Esther Anuhya, in 2014.

[POCSO Case] Former Anti-Corruption Judge Acquitted in Case of Sexually Abused 14-yr Old Child

A Rajasthan court acquitted Jitendra Singh Gulia, a former judge, of charges stemming from a mother’s complaint that he sexually abused her 14-year-old son at a tennis club in 2021. Despite allegations of drugging and intimidation, evidence presented by the defense led the judge to rule the claims unsubstantiated.

‘Judicial Decision Must Be Based on Legally Admissible Evidence, Not On Assumption’ : AP High Court Quashes Disciplinary Penalty on Police Constable

The Andhra Pradesh High Court, presided by Justice Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa, quashed a disciplinary penalty on police constable G. Srikanth, citing lack of legally admissible evidence and procedural flaws in the inquiry process. The court emphasized that significant penalties require substantial proof and adherence to natural justice principles.