The Andhra Pradesh High Court upheld orders involving Kudos Facility Services, saying DIN absence does not invalidate electronically issued documents reference numbers. Justices Rao Raghunandan Rao and T. C. D. Sekhar held digital validity and compliance were adequately proven.
The Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled that inseparable goods essential to services form a composite supply, and billing methods cannot alter tax classification under GST law. Judges said chemicals and mud engineering were naturally bundled for safe drilling operations.
The Rajasthan High Court set aside a GST appeal after finding that the same Additional Commissioner acted as both inspecting and appellate authority, holding such dual roles under Section 107 of the GST Act violated principles of fairness and natural justice.
The Gujarat High Court ruled that delays in filing GST appeals cannot be condoned beyond the statutory time limit, even under Article 226 writ jurisdiction. Justices A.S. Supehia and Pranav Trivedi dismissed the petition, citing excessive and impermissible delay.
Section 74 CGST Act, GST show cause notice ruling, High Court GST order, multiple year SCN illegal, GST year-wise assessment, Milroc Good Earth Developers case, Rite Water Solutions case, CGST legal update, GST compliance news, tax liability assessment India, GST litigation news, improper SCN GST, GST jurisdiction ruling, indirect tax law India, GST penalty dispute, GST demand notice case, financial year GST notice, tax law judgment India, GST enforcement rules
