The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted police protection to activists involved in a case against Elvish Yadav, known for allegations involving snake venom at parties. The court emphasized the need for security, given threats faced by the activists. This case showcases the challenges in wildlife protection cases and the risks for activists.
The special NIA court in Mumbai warned BJP MP Pragya Thakur to attend the 2008 Malegaon blast trial by April 25 or face consequences. Despite health issues, the court emphasized her obligation to participate. Failure to comply may result in further action, as her absence caused delays. Thakur and six co-accused currently on trial for various charges related to the blast.
The Patna High Court’s recent ruling clarified that seeking financial support from a wife’s parents for a child does not constitute dowry harassment. The decision overturned the husband’s conviction, stating that such requests for child support do not fall within the definition of dowry. The Court also recognized cultural practices related to newborn expenses.
Today, 11th April, The Madhya Pradesh High Court (HC) ruled that denying food to a married woman due to unmet dowry demands constitutes physical and mental cruelty, punishable under Section 498A of the IPC. The court also noted that forcing a woman to live in her parental home due to dowry non-payment constitutes mental harassment. The ruling rejected the plea to dismiss a First Information Report (FIR) filed by the wife against her husband and in-laws, stating the allegations of withholding food and mental harassment were substantial. The court emphasized that the FIR was not retaliatory and dismissed the husband’s petition.
Today 5th April,The Kerala HC dismissed charges against Nilesh Ramachandra Japthap for impersonating a police officer to enter S Sreesanth’s home. The court ruled that his actions did not cause harm, leading to the dismissal of the case under Section 419 of the Indian Penal Code. Japthap was represented by a team of advocates in court.
Bombay High Court has denied bail to a man accused of raping a minor and attempting to dispose of a premature foetus. the accused revealed that he had engaged in “illicit relations” with his minor next-door neighbor, leading to her pregnancy. The Bombay High Court has denied bail to a man accused of raping a […]
Justice Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa at the Andhra Pradesh High Court has granted bail to the defendant in a prominent case accused of rape and abduction. The ruling was issued following the Criminal Petition of 2024, wherein the petitioner requested ordinary bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Andhra Pradesh High […]
Today, the Delhi High Court addressed Sharjeel Imam’s bail plea in a case involving charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and sedition over his inflammatory speeches. The court has sought a response from the Delhi Police within two weeks and scheduled another hearing for April. Imam’s speeches at Aligarh Muslim University and in Delhi were perceived to instigate opposition to the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). Despite arguing that he should be granted statutory bail, the trial court refused Imam’s plea, emphasizing the disruptive impact of his speeches on the 2020 riots in the national capital. He faces severe charges under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the UAPA. The statutory bail in the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) allows for a maximum detention of 90 days, which can be extended to 180 days in terror-related cases under the UAPA. If the investigation is not complete at the end of this period, the court can release the person on default bail.
In a landmark decision that underscores the nuanced application of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, the Karnataka High Court has made a pivotal observation. The court stated that the POCSO Act is designed to safeguard minors from sexual abuse, not to penalize consensual relationships between adolescents. This clarification came during the […]
The Varanasi district court in Uttar Pradesh is set to deliver its verdict on February 27th regarding a criminal complaint lodged against well-known stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra. The case centers on allegations that Kamra disrespected the Indian National Flag through a contentious tweet, sparking widespread debate over the limits of satire and freedom of expression […]