The Supreme Court of India, in suo motu proceedings titled Re: Strengthening and Enhancing the Institutional Strength of Bar Associations, directed stakeholders to submit agreed terms of reference, with Justices Dipankar Datta and Satish Chandra Sharma seeking structured reforms for bar governance.
The Allahabad High Court’s Lucknow Bench set aside a 2006 triple-murder conviction, as Justices Rajnish Kumar and Zafeer Ahmad ruled the circumstantial evidence incomplete and unreliable. The court stressed extra-judicial confessions are weak, and recoveries cannot prove guilt reasonable doubt.
Justice Pankaj Bhatia of the Allahabad High Court recused himself from a bail plea, citing discouraging remarks by the Supreme Court of India and seeking reassignment. He asked Chief Justice to transfer roster, stating fairness, transparency, and trust processes.
The Supreme Court agreed to examine a judicial officer’s plea against Delhi High Court directions mandating refresher training in matrimonial laws. The High Court had criticised his handling of family court cases and ordered compulsory training at the Delhi Judicial Academy before further adjudication.
The Allahabad High Court criticised a lawyer for citing Ramcharitmanas to justify a nearly three-year delay in filing a writ petition, stressing that religious texts must not be misused in legal arguments. Justice Subhash Vidyarthi questioned reliance on chaupai.
