Senior lawyer Mukul Rohatgi questioned the complex process of impeaching judges, calling for a change in the system. He pointed out that in 75 years, no judge has been successfully impeached, despite multiple attempts. According to him, the process is so complicated that it becomes almost impossible to take action. His comments come amid the ongoing judge cash controversy, sparking fresh debate on judicial accountability.
Senior advocate KK Venugopal pointed out that in the early years of Independent India, the judiciary was so independent that Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru had strong concerns about its actions. Venugopal’s comments highlight how the judiciary was committed to staying free from political pressure. This tradition still shapes India’s legal system, ensuring a clear separation of powers and protecting the rule of law.
Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna briefed the Supreme Court’s full bench about a meeting concerning Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav’s controversial remarks about Muslims. These comments provoked public outcry and calls for impeachment. The Collegium is considering measures, including a possible inquiry and a public apology, to address the situation, emphasizing judicial independence.
Members of Parliament (MPs), led by senior advocate Kapil Sibal, Today (Dec 13) moved an impeachment motion against Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of the Allahabad High Court. The motion was submitted to the Rajya Sabha Secretary-General in response to remarks by Justice Yadav that have been perceived as targeting the Muslim community. This initiative, supported by the signatures of 55 MPs, is anticipated to be discussed during the ongoing Winter Session of Parliament.
Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav’s roster at Allahabad High Court is updated, effective December 16, limiting him to first appeals from district court orders filed up to 2010. This change follows controversy over his remarks regarding the Muslim community, prompting calls for his impeachment and reassigning sensitive cases to other justices.
Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of the Allahabad High Court sparked controversy with remarks suggesting India should align with majority views, referencing the Uniform Civil Code. His speech included derogatory comments about extremists and raised concerns regarding his impartiality. Criticism arose from legal experts about his commitment to constitutional values and judicial independence.