The Karnataka High Court ruled that individuals cannot be penalized solely for engaging in prostitution, distinguishing personal actions from exploitative activities. This decision came from a case involving a woman charged under the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act. Justice Nagaprasanna emphasized the protection of victims over unjust prosecution, reflecting a shift in legal handling of prostitution cases.
The Karnataka High Court ruled that individuals involved in prostitution cannot be prosecuted under Section 5 of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956, emphasizing that the law does not intend punishment for the victims. This significant judgment underscores the judiciary’s commitment to protecting the rights and dignity of those coerced into prostitution.
The Allahabad High Court clarified that brothel customers seeking personal satisfaction without financial gain are not liable under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. The ruling distinguishes customers from those involved in managing or profiting from prostitution, offering a nuanced understanding of legal accountability. This decision sets a significant precedent for future cases.
