The Supreme Court quashed an FIR under Section 498A of the IPC against a brother-in-law while observing that a Court should consider whether the implication is an “over implication” to pressurise the family of the husband to yield to the wife’s demands. The Court observed that the allegations in the FIR against the brother-in-law were nothing but an exaggerated version invariably suggesting “over implication.” The Bench dismissed the complainant’s appeal challenging the quashing of proceedings against the brother-in-law by the Punjab and Haryana High Court.
A man petitioned the Delhi High Court today (22nd Oct) for a medical examination of his wife, claiming she concealed her transgender identity, leading to emotional distress and legal complications. He argues that the rights of both spouses in marriage are interdependent, and seeks to avoid maintenance and domestic violence allegations based on her gender status.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court recently ruled that a wife calling her husband a Hijda (transgender) constitutes mental cruelty. The court upheld a divorce decree in favor of the husband, stating that such derogatory remarks and abusive conduct amount to cruelty, ultimately dissolving the marriage due to irreparable breakdown.
The Delhi High Court upheld that a husband must provide maintenance to his wife, regardless of her income, dismissing his claim that she was a “parasite.” The court emphasized respect for women’s sacrifices and reaffirmed legal obligations under the Hindu Marriage Act and Domestic Violence Act, highlighting the need for support against domestic abuse.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court emphasized that well-educated women should not solely rely on their husband’s maintenance, and marriage should not hinder a woman from seeking employment. The court reduced a maintenance payment from a husband to his wife, stating that she had the capacity to support herself through her education and skills.
The Allahabad High Court observed that when a wife declines to cohabit with the husband and forces him to a live separate room, she deprives him of his conjugal rights and the same amounts to cruelty.
In a landmark judgment, the Bombay High Court has intervened in a 15-year-long domestic dispute between a married couple, likening their relationship to the incompatible elements of fire and water.
The Supreme Court addressed the misuse of Section 498A, highlighting the replication of this provision in the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita without ample safeguards for husbands. The bench emphasized refraining from coercive use of law enforcement and urged reevaluation of the provision in light of upcoming implementation. (Word count: 52)
The Bombay High Court has ruled that filing false cases against a husband by the wife constitutes cruelty, emphasizing the need to prevent legal misuse in marital disputes. The court upheld the lower court’s decision to grant the divorce, citing the wife’s multiple baseless legal claims. This ruling reaffirms the serious consequences of misuse of legal provisions in familial disputes.
The Indore family court has ordered the wife to pay alimony of Rs 5,000 per month to her husband after both parties filed harassment complaints and sought spousal support. This ruling followed a legal battle between the couple, resulting in the court favoring the husband.
