On 7th May: Justice Surya Kant of the Supreme Court praised India’s early recognition of victims’ rights, citing the Code of Criminal Procedure and judicial precedents. He highlighted India’s progressive stance, cautioning against a one-size-fits-all approach to human rights and emphasizing their intrinsic role in Indian culture. The Supreme Court has played a crucial role in expanding fundamental rights in India.
Today, 29th April, The Chief Justice of India (CJI) led bench recalled an order permitting abortion for a 14-year-old rape survivor. The decision follows legal proceedings and considerations surrounding the case. This development highlights the complexities and legal intricacies involved in such sensitive matters within the Indian judicial system.
On Monday (15th April): The Bombay High Court affirmed the right to sleep as a fundamental human need, criticizing the Enforcement Directorate’s practice of recording statements overnight. It emphasized that deprivation of sleep violates Article 21 of the Indian Constitution and directed the ED to conduct interrogations at reasonable hours to safeguard individuals’ cognitive abilities and health.
Today(on1st April), The Supreme Court criticized a petitioner for bringing a public interest litigation on the mysterious death of Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose, calling it “reckless and irresponsible.” The court questioned the petitioner’s motives and asked for an affidavit to assess their commitment to societal welfare and human rights. Another hearing is scheduled in four weeks.
On 28th March(Today), the Solicitor General of India, Tushar Mehta, delivered a lecture at Jindal Global Law School titled “The Journey of the Supreme Court of India on the Fundamental Rights.” He emphasized the struggle and evolution of fundamental rights, from the Government of India Act of 1935 to present-day challenges, and highlighted the pivotal role of Justice Bhagwati in shaping India’s legal system.
Today(21st March),The Uttarakhand High Court orders the release of prisoners who have completed their sentences, addressing prolonged detention. Chief Justice Ritu Bahri, along with Justice Rakesh Thapliyal, takes Suo motu cognizance of the issue. The directive emphasizes prompt action, with a deadline for the government to comply, showcasing the court’s commitment to justice and human rights.
The Calcutta High Court ordered the release of a Pakistani national who had completed a three-year prison term but was detained due to Pakistan’s refusal to acknowledge his citizenship. Emphasizing equality and personal liberty, the court stated that his continued detention violated his right to dignity. The decision comes after the petitioner filed a plea seeking release to reunite with his family.
In a landmark judgment that underscores the vital role of motherhood in society, the Himachal Pradesh High Court has emphatically declared that motherhood is not only a fundamental right of women but also an essential duty for the continuation of the human race. This profound declaration came from Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, who, in his […]
